User talk:Samudra95

Hi, please contact here to raise doubts/objections over my edits.

Welcome!

Hi Samudra95! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 08:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Variyan Kunnathu Kunjahammed Haji

Hello, I'm BhaskaraPattelar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Variyan Kunnathu Kunjahammed Haji, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It may be removed, if you don't add a source. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 07:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I will provide more sources for future edits Samudra95(talk) 10.00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

A lengthy welcome

Hi Samudra95. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aloe vera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Don't add spam or low-quality journal sources for medical content. See WP:WHYMEDRS, and follow the quality-source guide for medical content on Wikipedia - WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

C.N. Annadurai Mudaliyar

@Samudra95: Former Chief Ministe C.N. Annadurai officially used Mudaliar title in many areas

Proof👇 https://books.google.co.in/books?id=yqcSAAAAIAAJ&q=C.N.+Annadurai+Nataraja+Mudaliar&dq=C.N.+Annadurai+Nataraja+Mudaliar&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj9sL7hjYvsAhVX6nMBHevoBbMQ6AEwAnoECAMQAQ Tirukodimadachengunrur (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Serols (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the article name and use sources. --Serols (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tiruvaikuntam, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 09:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recentness

Observations by academic scholars are not removed simply because they are dated. However, I would love to have new ethnographic material from the site. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm TheWikiholic. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Pappu, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheWikiholic (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Annamalai (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Geardona was:

No endorsement from DRV has been supplied, whenever it is resubmitted please place a link to that in a convenient place.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. Annamalai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Geardona (talk to me?) 01:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samudra95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Geardona (talk to me?) 01:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found you kiron XD

da da da Ethicalweb (talk) 18:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]