User talk:Samosa Poderosa

Hallo everyone!

Keen Footwear

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Keen Footwear, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. WLU 13:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Samosa Poderosa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

No welcome! Shameful! WLU 18:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keen footwear

I've tidied up the Keen Footwear page with some citation templates and combined two articles into a single ref tag. I've also asked an admin their opinion on the article regards notability, depending what she says I'll may leave it alone or take it to WP:AFD. If you know of other sources, adding them would almost certainly help it pass WP:CORP.

Thanks, WLU 18:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. The admin I asked was User:FisherQueen, and she loosely indicated that the article meant it was on the border of notability - enough for me I guess. If you do turn up another discussion in a WP:RS, it'd be free and clear, if still a stub.

Incidentally, there's a couple tricks and tools available for citations:

Citation templates - internal structure of citation templates
WP:FOOT - how to use the <ref> <ref name> </ref> tags
Reference generator
pubmed/ISBN template generator - super handy
Google scholar autocitation

WLU 12:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Art Jewelry Forum

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio craft, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forum Clarefinin (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]