User talk:Generalirius

February 2022

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grand Admiral Thrawn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 09:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Samonic! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sciencefish (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll enjoy my stay, I've already checked it out, thank you though.Generalirius (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grand Admiral Thrawn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that infoboxes present a summary of main body of an article. They do not contain information independent of the body. See Help:Infobox. As usual, all additions need a reliable secondary source. Sciencefish (talk) 10:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sciencifish, I did add content indeed. Ah, I've reviewed the page and the referencing guidelines, still, haven't had much luck. Would a book be a reliable source? Or would it be counted as "original research"? Of course, I'd not be doing original research, rather searching for the information in the book. Thank you, have a nice day. Best regards,

Generalirius (talk) 11:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the book is the original source of the information, then it's a primary source, which should be avoided per WP:RSPRIMARY. If there is no secondary source then the information is likely not notable and shouldn't be included. You may also find Wikipedia:Too much detail helpful. Sciencefish (talk) 11:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, I'm definitely not used to not using primary sources. I have plenty of experience with the latter, having edited other sites. Thank you. Best regards,

Generalirius (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cristina Valido García has been accepted

Cristina Valido García, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 08:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi Generalirius! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Asqueladd (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joshua Fit the Battle of Jericho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let Them Talk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]