User talk:Samodeyar

Concern regarding Draft:Culture of North Karnataka

Hello, Samodeyar. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Culture of North Karnataka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jewelleries of North Karnataka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jewelleries of North Karnataka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 15:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for that but whatever I wrote is on the bases of my own research in North karnataka Samodeyar (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jewelleries of North Karnataka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jewelleries of North Karnataka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Samodeyar (talk) 09:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pulakeshin II without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 20:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because the content was not correct. Avanijashraya pulakeshi is different than pulakeshin 2 of chalukyas of vatapi. And that painting reveal about Persian ambassadors come to vatapi. And in history there's no mention about pulakeshin 2 of chalukyas of vatapi had given any gifts to khussru. Here you must know that avanijashraya pulakeshi is different from pulakeshin 2 of chalukyas of vatapi. Samodeyar (talk) 10:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jewelleries of North Karnataka

Hello, Samodeyar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jewelleries of North Karnataka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chalukya dynasty, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — SANDBOXES — LOGS — 21:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Kiran891. I noticed that you recently removed content from History of Maharashtra without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 16:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belawadi Mallamma. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 16:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Karnata Kingdom has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 16:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing.

Do not remove sourced content; take it to the article talk page if you have opinions. Wikipedia needs reputable sources, not opinions. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 19:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi Samodeyar! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Belawadi Mallamma several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Belawadi Mallamma, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 13:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sari, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Self-published sources, such as blogs, are not reliable and not acceptable as sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kuppasa(Khana) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kuppasa(Khana), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 12:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuppasa(Khana) (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kuppasa(Khana) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kuppasa(Khana), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samodeyar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuppasa (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are 7 sources in the current version of the draft.

Source 1 seems like an OK source, but it does not mention the term kuppasa (referring to the fabric as khana). The draft contains a few sentences copied straight from this source, which is not acceptable; it is a copyright violation, and in addition, the source is not very well-written, so using parts of sentences from it creates a rather confusing draft text.
Source 2 is a login page to the CAB International database. Since there is no info about what the source is supposed to be, I can't guess if it is relevant or not. WP:CITEREF is important reading.
Source 3 is an online dictionary using various web scraper techniques to collect info from other sources; for a web scraper it's pretty good, but it is not useful as a source.
Source 4 is a commercial website selling khana blouses – that's not a reliable source (and again, I can't see the term kuppasa used)
Source 5 is some kind of database, not quite sure of what; it says something about "geographical indications" which is presumably the "GI tag" in the draft, but it would need some more explanations
Source 6 is a short article from a Kannada language newspaper – it seems to be an OK source, but since I'm relying on autotranslating software, I can't really tell
Source 7 is the most in-depth source; not sure if the Isha Foundation's website is a WP:RS, but it might be OK. It calls the fabric khun or khana, though.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kuppasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 19:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kuppasa

Hello, Samodeyar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kuppasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kuppasa

Hello, Samodeyar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kuppasa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]