User talk:Sambokim

Speedy deletion of Patrik Martinec

A tag has been placed on Patrik Martinec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. tennis man 05:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Sambokim! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! SriMesh | talk 04:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Dong-Hwan Song

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dong-Hwan Song, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jon Awe

A tag has been placed on Jon Awe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 04:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Crossmr (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the future please do not copy and paste information from other websites in to articles. This is the third time I've had to remove that same text from the asia league ice hockey article. In addition please do not remove sourced content from articles without explanation. especially when you're reinserting cut and paste text. This is an encyclopedia article, not a promotional article which is just going to copy the press releases and news items off of the team's website.--Crossmr (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've been told before. Do not copy and paste content from websites into the article.--Crossmr (talk) 14:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed by administrators

Hello Sambokim. If you want to preserve your ability to edit Wikipedia, you must follow our policies. This especially applies to promotional material. See a discussion of your editing at the ANI noticeboard. You may add your own comment there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sambokim. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard regarding your inability to stop copy and pasting from websites. Thank you.--Crossmr (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Creating copyright violations. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

No response to warnings. Did not participate in the discussion of his editing at WP:AN or in the previous thread at WP:ANI. EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 02:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Halla Archives

Can you please see what you can do to get the Halla news items from before 2008 put back on the website? "게시물:77 쪽번호:1/11 오늘:63 전체:54653" "Object Num :56 Page Num:1/4 Today Count:22 Total Count:8730" There are a lot of news items on there from the past, and it would make writing the article much easier if they were not hidden. I'm also worried if they archive again, it will break many references on the current halla article.--Crossmr (talk) 01:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are being discussed by the administrators again

Hello, Sambokim. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Crossmr (talk) 00:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not mass-add links to articles as references. Just because a news story mentions a subject or something related to a subject does not make it a reference for an article. You can read the external link policy at WP:EL.--Crossmr (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yang Seung-jun

The article Yang Seung-jun has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mauler90 _talk 06:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding links to articles from anyanghalla.com, which you have been advised before, also using multiple accounts to do this.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note, this user was using IP 220.088.45.189, which was blocked for a month for adding these links on 15 March 2011 [1]. User has returned to their account to add the same links, also i believe are also using 203.90.36.94 and 203.90.47.109 to add the same links. New IPs also blocked. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yang Seung-jun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yang Seung-jun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yang Seung-jun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kim Woo-jae for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Woo-jae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Woo-jae until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samuel H. Kim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel H. Kim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel H. Kim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]