User talk:Samarkaand

July 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 11:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samarkaand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Acroterion's action is highly arbitrary. The person is a character that can at best be described in the same spirit as Nigel Farage described Von Rompuy. Rather that judging the argument and edit on its merit, Acroterion behaves like a Cyberarsonist who is endowed with the capability to read but unable to judge what it means or its implications. Wikipedia has become a platform that needs professionalisation as it deals with information, and to curtail the risk that it does not become an aspirational platform for non serious amateurs like Acroterion. What Fox News or Setty could find with the same information, Acroterion could not. The acts of Acroterion make the person more suitable to scrub the floors of a professional news agency than to handle information. It has been said for people like Acroterion- where is wisdom lost in knowledge, and where is knowledge lost in information. But Acroterion's talent is appreciated by the birds of his own flock- Yunshui ( Don Quixote of Wikipedia), Bwilson (someone who would move from Lib Dem to EDL with a pint of beer and chips) Samarkaand (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.