User talk:Samalik16

Welcome!

Hello, Samalik16, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sandtalon (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lolibaba

However, I unfortunately did revert your edits to lolicon. Don't take this personally; I know they were in good faith. Unfortunately, the content of those edits does not quite conform to Wikipedia's standards on sources. Every claim on Wikipedia has to be backed up by a reliable source (see WP:RS, and you can't bring in your own knowledge not found in the sources (the original research policy). In this case, the relevant passage sourced for the information about lolibaba says, "'None of this makes any sense if you try to read it without understanding the language,' Kagami explains to me, animated by his fifth cup of coffee during a lunch appointment. 'Let’s say I write a Lolita granny (roribaba). That’s a character type, you know, Lolita granny. It makes no sense unless you understand that Lolita means a young girl character with a small chest and granny refers to the fact that she speaks or sounds like an old woman. You know, saying ‘ja’ at the end of a sentence. You have to read the character in terms of design, scenario and sound.'" If you can find another reliable source to back up the additional claims you want to make, then you could add those back in. But regardless, I hope you continue to edit; we value all editor's contributions as long as they are in good faith, and one of the most important Wikipedia guidelines is to be bold with your edits! Sandtalon (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your recent editing history at Sonic Unleashed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 02:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Resident Evil 4, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 12:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

At least 3 editors are telling you that your sources dont meet Wikipedia's standards for use. It's time to stop reverting and start discussing (and maybe reflect on your understanding of Wikipedia's sourcing standards.) Sergecross73 msg me 15:53, 16 September 2022 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Strike Witches, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 04:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shukusei!! Loli Goddess Requiem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shukusei!! Loli God Requiem banned?

Good evening @Samalik16: Have you heard anything about the song being banned by NHK in Japan for being rated as a NG song? Ui also told in a stream that the song is entirely based on an inside joke but I could not find any reliable sources for it. --Goroth (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ui implies that the song was banned on the basis of insulting language, which was likely derived from the sadomasochistic nature of the lyrics. She even implies a line that may have been too much. The song was still played as a background music during her radio interview though.

It's not based on an inside joke, but rather recurring jokes and trends in her streams. Her audience melting over her loli self is one thing, and the fact that she calls us "gomi" aka "garbage" multiple times throughout the song is also her official fandom name. Samalik16 (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my belated feedback and thank you for clarifying. --Goroth (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Spider-Man 2 (2023 video game), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have had several warnings concerning edit warring. Follow WP:BRD instead. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ghost Stories (Japanese TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]