User talk:Samaleks/Archive 3

File:Chenkalchoola.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chenkalchoola.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 08:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus Warning!

Please show the proof, based on edit histories, that I am doing edit war anywhere.

Alleging edit war when you can't prove your biased POV on the talk page is an often used strategy. Please refrain from it.

DileepKS(talk) 11:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you have been running around several TALK pages accusing me and several others of EDIT WARS. Please go on and prove the same or else you will be the first one to be blocked. Moreover, you cannot prove your POV and when defeated, going around making accusations is a good way out. Communist? - MountainWhiskey (talk) 19:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Thiruvananthapuram . While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment of Mountainwhiskey

Enough of your hounding Mountainwhiskey (talk · contribs)! You have gone beyond good faith and are now harassing him/her. Stop now. You will be blocked and potentially have an interaction ban put in place if you continue. Toddst1 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel attacks

WARNING

Personnel attacks done by user lowerfourth (See his talk history), but why no warning to him? Only to Dileepks, Mountainwhiskey etc. That means you are in the list TVC biased editors. And I am in wiki from 2006, not from NOV 2010.

I have not heard about skyscrapercity before. Thank you very much for informing such a wonderful forum. Now onwards I can be active in that forum too.

--Bijuts (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

--Bijuts (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Thiruvananthapuram. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Your BLIND REVERTS continue to exist...

Please explain the following action:

on 1 March 2011 @ 06.50HRS you reverted an edit by a IP user which entered the Sikhs as a community in Kochi. Being an 'established' user, it is good to practice wiki policy of no Blind Reverts for which you have already been warned. If there is no SIKH community in Kochi, you must mention that. You cannot expect a IP user who must be a noobie to do that. I have reverted your edit by adding multiple references - MountainWhiskey (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALLEGATION OF EDIT WARS/SOCK ETC - MARCH 2011

@ Samaleks - I have seen your allegation of SOCK on Todd's TALK page. Please prove your allegation of myself using multiple IDs or IPs to conduct the edit war on the Thiruvananthapuram. Wiki, I believe, has unbiased policies to prove you right or wrong. Let us wait for that to happen :) - MountainWhiskey (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that you have been warned several times ^^^^ to stop making allegations without any proof. If you cannot push your POV, edit warring is not the way out. Seek and you shall find, but only if it is true :) - MountainWhiskey (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your TALK on User: Aarem's page

It is not me, but the users with Di lep KS as the leader, is doing the edit-warring. Mantanwhiskey is the arrogant chap in their team, and Biju kuttan is the ignorant chap. DileepKS (KS seems to be an interesting acronym :-D ) is triggering all these planned edit-wars from behind the curtain. He wants to try to push his POV which is STRONGLY in favor of KOCHI and AGAINST TRIVANDRUM. Hence, he is trying to remove facts (those are holding valid citations). --Samaleks (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY TO SAMALEKS can be found here

Could not find Users by the names of Di lep KS and Mantanwhiskey. Oh, if you were referring to DileepKS and Mountainwhiskey, TWO things:

1. Please go back to Kindergarten in an English Medium school and get your spelling right. Hey, just kidding ok? Pls don't take this too personal. 2. Now, here is the important one - You said i am involved in edit warring. Perfect, How do you plan to PROVE it? Samaleks, this is not typical Commie country or a banana republic. I think there is something called Law of the Land on Wiki. Let Wiki prove you right and me wrong. Don't go around blah blah all over town. The truth is there for everyone to see. Hey, have you ever contributed anything on your own, I mean have you ever researched and added content to Wiki or are you here just to REVERT? Time to Change? - MountainWhiskey (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, such as the edits you made to [[:Thiruvananthapuram]],. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MountainWhiskey (talk) 01:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. For accusing User:Mountainwhiskey of Sock Puppetry and Edit-warring. If you do not have proof, you cannot accuse. MountainWhiskey (talk) 01:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technopark

Samaleks, your comments invited on Talk:Technopark,_Trivandrum#Cable Landing at Trivandrum connects only to Sri Lanka and Maldives

DileepKS(talk) 02:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COK Airport Claims on Kochi page

Samaleks, you called WP:BRD on Kochi page. Thank you.

You did B by removing the claims. I see that BijuTs did R. Now, let us do D in good faith. There is already a section opened on the Talk page for discussion. Please state your arguments there.

DileepKS(talk) 15:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking Bijuts offline to make the revert. You are very cunning; and reminds me of the old fox story in Panchatantra (its a compliment). :-) --Samaleks (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have nothing better than allegations to make, the discussion ends, because you haven't provided any reference to prove your point.

DileepKS(talk) 10:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont act as a MEAT PUPPET for Trivandrum topics

Dear Sama, you are contributing well to wikipedia, especially in reverting. But, please donot act as a MEAT PUPPET for User:Lower4th, anonymus ips and co. Just by doing so will do no good in your wiki life, but instead you may invite more bans. Hence I request you to concentrate on your favourite topics and do not be a WP:MEAT for those users from skyscrapercity forums. -- --Bijuts (talk) 04:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Using Abusive Languages in Wiki

This is not a place for such things, so I am not replying here.

--Bijuts (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette Alert

Hello, Samaleks. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Palakkad Railway Division

Atlast you did a good job in wiki by creating Palakkad Railway Division article.

--Bijuts (talk) 08:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Really? Thanks for your advice.

--Bijuts (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Do not editwar on articles and try to push your POV. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are likely to attract another BLOCK. --Bijuts (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

This is your last warning; Please do not edit war in Kerala, Kochi and Trivandrum pages to push your POV. From all the warnings that were issued to you, I hope you are aware that using anonymous IPs / Socks to evade block also will result in a block.

--Bijuts (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Allegation on Technopark Page

Samaleks, you have made a very serious allegation against me on the Technopark page. I have presented a government issued document, which could easily be verified at the source. Yet you have alluded that it might have been fabricated. This is in violation of all etiquette of wikipedia.

I demand an apology.

DileepKS(talk) 05:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apology!!??? For what? You better read my edit summary again.

I said "How can I believe your RTI is not fabricated by you? Planning commission report carries more weightage.

"A report published by the Government is more reliable. Hence dont remove that ref.".

--Samaleks (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are alluding to dishonesty upon me, which is a serious allegation. You may not consider honesty to be a virtue, and may be ready to fabricate documents. Please do not assume others are like that. Your statement goes against wikiquette, and is a personal attack. An apology is needed, but as I am accustomed to your behaviour here, I do not expect you to neither understand the folly, nor acknowledge it.

DileepKS(talk) 03:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now, this is a mild form of personal attack. I think you have not read Wiki etiquette before posting the first comment here. :-) If not, here is the link : Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#What_is_considered_to_be_a_personal_attack.3F

Please go through it. --Samaleks (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kerala. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 16:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? 1 revert? Toddst1 (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bijuts and Samaleks are known for reverting each other's edits. It has kind of erupted again and they're reverts are cyclic. The two always disagree with each other.—Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see Biju has been blocked for 72 hours.—Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 03:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me where I violated the 3R? --Samaleks (talk)