User talk:Sam raggio

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HostDime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page João Pessoa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Animal Care Centers of NYC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NY.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brand new logo for Warner Music Group

I work for Warner Music Group. I see you have contributed in the past to the Warner Music Group article. There’s a brand new logo for WMG. I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons as the representative of the company, but I know I’m not supposed to directly edit Wikipedia articles when I have a conflict of interest. Would you be able to take a look at the request to swap out the old logo and logo caption at Talk:Warner Music Group/Archives/2021#Help switching to new logo ? Thank you so much for your consideration.Music2022 (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rozalind Drummond

Hello Sam, I'm curious about where you have found 'promotional' language on Rozalind Drummond - could you clarify. In discussing her work in that section I have been careful to use neutral language and only incorporated option that is referenced, and only one statement by the artist herself. I have included a section 'Recognition' and in that have included both positive and negative reviews of her work to provide a balanced assessment of her oeuvre. I am not associated with Drummond, and am happy to follow up on your suggestions if you can identify non-encyclopaedic passages. Regards Jamesmcardle^(talk) 07:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have too many quotations. Please consider reducing them. Sounds too promotional. Check WP:QUOTEFARM. Sam raggio (talk) 07:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am familiar with WP:QUOTEFARM and I don't agree that quotation is being used excessively here. My intention is to show how critical reception to this postmodern artist subtlety changed with time (and acceptance of the style). Some are hardly 'promotional' but rather, condemn her work. Quotations do this best, as I would be misrepresenting the critics' quite nuanced opinions by merely paraphrasing them and it is impossible to preserve their meaning in paraphrase (which you can see I have done with some here). If you still think it a problem can you please change the template to as you haven't shown that

‹ The template below (Promotional) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

is appropriate. I'll leave the article for a while and come back to complete the citations for the exhibitions you have removed. Cheers, Jamesmcardle^(talk) 07:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I changed the template, but typically more than 1 or 2 quotes is too many. And its the quotations that make it promotional when they are positive in nature.Sam raggio (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Expertwikiguy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]