User talk:Sam max929

Welcome!

Hello, Sam max929, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Samir malek, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vrenator (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samir malek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samir malek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography of samir malek

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral-point-of-view policies.

About your earlier question here, allow me to explain this to you:

“

Writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, unless your writing has been approved by other editors in the community. Editing a biography about yourself should only be done in clear-cut cases.

Wikipedia has gone through many prolonged disputes about the significance, factual accuracy, and neutrality of such articles. Avoiding such editing keeps Wikipedia neutral and helps avoid pushing a particular point of view.

Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography, and there are many pitfalls.

If you have published elsewhere on a topic, we welcome your expertise on the subject for Wikipedia articles. However, every Wikipedia article must cover its subject in a neutral, fair, and comprehensive way in order to advance knowledge of the subject as a whole. Please forget your biases while enriching the Wikipedia readers' knowledge. Articles that exist primarily to advance the interests of the contributor will likely be deleted.

”

Please leave your question(s) here if you need any further clarifications and I will get back to you ASAP, thank you and best. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 01:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing I need to remind you and that is... Wikipedia is not a social networking site such as Facebook or Myspace nor is it a blog for you to write about yourself. By definition, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, hence all un-encyclopedic informations are mercilessly deleted on sight. Hope you will understand this and move on, thank you. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 13:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an information page.

It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting.

Shortcuts

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.

An encyclopedia is a written compendium of knowledge.

Wikipedia is freely available, and combines many features
of general and specialized encyclopedias and other reference works.

Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for random information.

Wikipedia is not a place to publish unverifiable material.

Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own ideas.

Wikipedia is not a place to publish your opinions.

Wikipedia is not a free advertising space.

Wikipedia is not a social networking site.

Wikipedia is not an advocacy platform.

Wikipedia is not an internet directory.

Wikipedia is not for medical advice.

Wikipedia is not for legal advice.

Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy.

Wikipedia is not a democracy.

Wikipedia is not an anarchy.

Wikipedia is not censored.

Wikipedia is not nearly this in-your-face most of the time.

Proposed deletion of Bunty Monani

The article Bunty Monani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bunty Monani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bunty Monani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7582132/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm NeemNarduni2. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Bunty Monani, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bunty Monani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bunty Monani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunty Monani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided one more link from the NewsPaper - Absolute India news paper published on 26th Jan 2016 - why the same was put into "External Links" instead of "References" -Sam max929

February 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunty Monani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunty Monani with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ⁓ Hello 71 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]