Jump to content

User talk:SamCrawford1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SamCrawford1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi SamCrawford1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hungerball has been accepted

[edit]
Hungerball, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SamCrawford1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is absolutely no evidence for the profile block. I have never used 'People Per Hour'. Other than possibly a similar/same name, there is no way to even prove this - It would seem one user has a personal vendetta and blocked me from editing/creating without due diligence.

Decline reason:

Looking at this even without contacting Yunshui, as well as looking at the nature of your edits, I also believe you are an undisclosed paid editor. Right now it would be best for you to be honest about this. If you are a different Sam Crawford, you will need to provide a better explanation than just a denial. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:02, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SamCrawford1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This feels like a bit of a ganging up. My email address is themanblueprint@gmail.com - check whatever email is associated with this People Per Hour profile. I am from Wales, where is this other person from? To be honest, it simply seems coincidental - can you please review the evidence that Yunshui is offering? Maybe an IP address or something similar. Thanks. SamCrawford1 (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. The whole email debacle is irrelevant and in no way addresses our concerns. And that you deny a relationship with the subject really does not allay my concerns And contacting People Per Hour would prove nothing. Would you be willing to accept an unblock on the condition that you do not edit about Ava Eagle Brown or any other COI subject I might not be aware of? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was paid to write this article.