User talk:Salviati64

Advice

Please refrain from your caustic unproductive sarcasm. If it continues, you may be reported to admins.--Jeffro77 (talk) 04:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn’t expect any less. Please desist from vandalising my talk page with your unsubstantial whining. IC (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Roxy the dog. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 16:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it does deter User talk:Roxy the dog from ignorant drive by editing. He should know better. And he has broad shoulders, he doesn't need you protecting him from big scary words. Stay on point PaleoNeonate. Stop the condescention, just edit. If you had, you wouldn't have had to protect User talk:Roxy the dog --IC (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Salviati64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read through block policy, what is this for? Does rigorous discussion now account for a personal attack? No warning? Just censure? IC (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.