User talk:SaltySnow

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SaltySnow! Thank you for your contributions. I am DougHill and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DougHill (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

wikitia.com

Please don't cite Wikitia.com as you did here. It's considered WP:USERG and unreliable for use in Wikipedia. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the feedback— Preceding unsigned comment added by SaltySnow (talk • contribs) 07:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi SaltySnow. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about foxchronicle.com

Hi SaltySnow. I finally got around to seeing what others think of it as a reference: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#foxchronicle.com. Feel free to comment. --Ronz (talk) 04:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. I notice that you've recently added some content from sources Wikipedia doesn't consider reliable. You might like to familiarise yourself with this handy guide, and if you have any questions about sourcing the friendly people at WP:RSN will be happy to help. Guy (help!) 09:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]