User talk:Salsa man
Dear Salsa man,
Thanks for the treatment of the text.
Frequently was used as the listed techniques are really used 'frequently' in contrast others. However, there are several other ways of measurement, therefore 'commonly' works also very well.
The mentioned sentence was already changed. It was a truncated sentence, I do not know the reason.
I have checked the text for other corrections made by you, but I could not find any in the 'diff'.
As I am working with Chemotexis and the related keywords a lot in the last periode, please let me know about the problems with the text.
Thanks again for the improvement and reading of the long story. My purpose is to make it a good quality (featured artickle perheps).
Best regards from,
Kohlasz
Chemotaxis
[edit]Dear Salsa man,
I am sorry to be so slow with my answer, but my day was very busy. You know, I am working as a cell biologist, and my field is signaling. (Anyway signaling or signalling ? - in references you can find both). What is your topic ? I am really very happy that you had so much time and energy to correct the page chemotaxis. It is also very great that you feel the quality of the page good enough for nomination to be a featured article. If you feel so, please do it - thank you for the evaluation.
Thank you for your help.
Best regards from,
Kohlasz (Kohidai, Laszlo, Budapest)
Hello Salsa man,
I have found that the page 'Olmec hieroglyphs' was started by you. Congratulations, it is a very interesting finding, I missed the article in the Science. I have only one question, however the topic very far from my speciality: the text of the page tells that the orientation writing on the stone is different from the previously dicovered ones, they were vertically arranged and it is horizontal. Well, if you take the stone and rotate 90 degree you can also find lines - some of them are broken, but there are series of symbols. I think that orientation of the symbols on a stone or paper is very individual and up to the person who makes them. Perhaps this a totally stupid comment, but I wonder what is your opinion about this. Best regards from Kohlasz 06:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Jaca brazil 2007.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Jaca brazil 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 11:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
The article Frei0r has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of why this is notable enough for inclusion.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 05:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)