User talk:SalsaSiempre

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can add more references. There are not a lot of them compared to other artists. That’s why I felt he should get a wiki page, so that the world can know his contributions. What do you feel reads like an advertisement? The man is dead and he actually died never getting recognition for his contributions to music. Is stating his works advertisement? SalsaSiempre (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi SalsaSiempre! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Salsa music several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Salsa music, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Note that WP:ONUS says disputed material should remain out of the article until consensus is formed to include it.. Binksternet (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justi Barreto moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Justi Barreto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justi Barreto (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justi Barreto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SalsaSiempre! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Justi Barreto

Hello, SalsaSiempre. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justi Barreto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Salsa music. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaged in an edit war. I am restoring information that has been on the page for quite some time. You deleted them stating that the references were not sufficient. I felt that if that was truly the reason for the deletion you had a valid point. So I then provided references to fulfill your request. Now that the references you said were lacking were provided, you deleted the information again.

This means that your deletion was not due to references but you were actually trying to deny the general public from valid historical information that you did not like.

You are trying to block information saying that your don't find it important. You don't get to decide this information for the entire world.

You should be reported to wikipedia. I have never deleted another persons post on wikipedia. I have only restored the ones that were deleted by complying with your request for better references.

I would love to take this taken up with Wikipedia as a cyberbully like yourself should not be allowed to intimidate honest people from posting relevant fact checked information. SalsaSiempre (talk) 12:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]