User talk:Salqu Ligand

References

You might not be aware that Wikipedia places more citations to books, books moreso than reviews, and there is hardly any interest in recent primary literature. See WP:SECONDARY. Wikipedia sees itself as an encyclopedia, not as a competitor with review journals. Please be cautious about citing your own work You also might check Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry). Good luck and happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I am going to remove your recent references to your ligand. It is not very notable. Please ask around about the criteria. Or read WP:Notable. We try not to use Wikipedia for publicizing recent publications, other venues exist for disseeminating that kind of information. The most important evidence of notability is that others use the reagent or compound, and not just for isolated research publications. Feel free to contact me if you do not understand this message, otherwise, everyone becomes frustrated. That's no fun. You might consider editing other articles, but my advice would be to avoid citing yourself. --Smokefoot (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salen structure.png

Thank you for uploading File:Salen structure.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Preparation of salqu.png

Thank you for uploading File:Preparation of salqu.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]