User talk:Sallison

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 05:28, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Emotions about emotion

I actually think the Emotion page is fine as is. It presents a psychological and philosophical perspective and I think the link you put to your affective neuroscience article is the way to go regarding neural mecanisms. One comment about the affective neuroscience article, it looks like its coming along nicely, but you really need a section in there regarding affective disorders, since many of what is known in this field stems from their study. Nice job though! Nrets 15:30, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sallison: my apologies for not getting back to you sooner. My activities of this semester have proven to be rather time consuming. I appreciate your comments on the FA success of cerebellum. I promise once things calm a bit I will get around to offering comments on the emotion article. Semiconscious (talk · home) 19:02, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pick's Disease, etc.

Hi Sallison and welcome to Wikipedia. The See Also section is a good idea to have, but I remember reading in guidelines (unfortunately I can't remember the exact place...but I'm sure I read it in the guidelines) that categorization should be used instead of "See Also," especially when it's just a short list like that. I noticed that all of the articles listed in "See Also" were in the "Cognitive disorders" category, so I just added Pick's Disease to that category. But if you're going to put all those other references in a context in the article, then that See Also can be there, but is the Cognitive disorders category appropriate for Pick's Disease? --CDN99 20:04, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dementia

Thank you for your note! I have made some alterations in the text, and will make a comment on the talk page. / Habj 18:00, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience

Hey Sallison: I'm trying to revive the Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience and thought you might care to join us over there if you've got the time! Semiconscious (talk · home) 09:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for pointing out my error. I wasn't aware that frontal degeneration was uncommon in AD. I'm still pretty new at this whole clinical thing. :) Semiconscious (talk · home) 07:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image came from my lab. It's definitely FT degen. I just screwed up my naming of the images, and didn't notice during the upload. I've got a bank of images on my comp to upload still for articles I'm working on. Semiconscious (talk · home) 06:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch

Can you please watch this page: Amygdala MirnaSun 00:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thank you for the affirmative feedback concerning my cleanup on the amygdala page. I'm probably not the only one who loses confidence in some of these bio-psychology related topics after reading a few lines. I'll enter some comments on emotion, but I'm not nearly ready to attempt changes there. MoniqueRN 18:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photic sneeze reflex

I responded to you on my talk page. SDC 00:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the edit that I had reversed. [1] Then I noticed this note in the aricle: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8108024.

It referenced the the photic sneeze reflex as a previously unrecognized problem. So I figured the statement was bad and therefore took it back out. SDC 00:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FTLD/FTD

Thank you for the well justified and needed correction of wording to the article on frontotemporal lobar degeneration. I couldn't agree more that it's important to keep pathological entities and clinical syndromes distinct. Also, I think it's important to keep the relevant information about the clinical entities thought to be caused by those pathologic processes in the article somehow. This is why I added some of the information you removed back to the article. Hopefully, this or something like it will seem a fair compromise. Cheers, sallison 00:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your edits and appreciate the courteous note. A glance at the CV on your page makes it clear you know much more about this topic than I do! -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 03:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Lyford House, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chzz ► 02:56, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tonopah and Tidewater Railroad logo.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Tonopah and Tidewater Railroad logo.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sallison. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nermeen Shaikh (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nermeen Shaikh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nermeen Shaikh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sallison! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 09:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nermeen Shaikh (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not deem TedX and Democracy Now as secondary sources. Provide at least one reliable, secondary (that has no connection with the subject in any manner) source that significantly covered the person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nermeen Shaikh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nermeen Shaikh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 03:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sallison. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Lebedev

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuroscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 01:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]