User talk:Salinae

Welcome!

Hello, Salinae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Deletion

I deleted the article under CSD A7 as I believed it was not a very notable family. I still do think the family itself is not notable in a more general respect, but if you disagree, I would appreciate if you could provide me with some references as to why the family is notable. Thanks. Nishkid64 17:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the family did have references but I don't see how they are notable outside of Cheshire. I mean...if you just google "France-Hayhurst" you only get 350 hits, which doesn't really seem to justify the family's notability. Nishkid 64 23:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good point about Google. I was thinking that, but I wasn't so sure. Anyway, you persuaded me to change my decision, so now I have restored the article. =) Nishkid 64 00:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Epic Barnstar
		I just noticed your excellent contributions in History of Middlewich, History of salt in Middlewich and various other Middlewich related articles and I must say I am impressed with your professional contributions. I found both to be fascinating reads. There's not many towns with this depth of coverage. You and your work are a credit to wikipedia, keep it up. YDAM TALK 12:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible project or sub-project dealing with Cheshire

Hello, I've noticed that you've been making some really good entries about a number of towns and sites in Cheshire, and so I thought I'd tell you about this, since I think you would make a useful contributor to any project or sub-project that was set up: I've listed a proposed project concerning Cheshire on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals. I think it can easily co-exist with Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography. If you are interested in contributing to this proposed project, please add your name to list at the appropriate place. You can have a broader discussion about it here. Many thanks. _DDS talk 23:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New project concerned with Cheshire

Thanks for showing an interest in a new project about all things concerning Cheshire. I've set up a project page, and its associated talk now, which you can see here. It would be really good if you were able to join the project by adding your name to the page, and adding it to your watchlist. Please feel free to contribute to setting up the project page for example, by joining in or creating discussions you can find on the talk page. Looking forward to seeing you there. DDStretch (talk) 12:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories of Cheshire (on the project talk page)

Hi! I see we were editing at the same time. I have just added a section specifically about categoeries. Would it be an idea to move your comment within that section? I think your suggestion is a good one, by the way. DDStretch (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Middlewich GA

I just had a quick look at this and there is something very wrong with the wikification after your quote from Boswell. Good luck with the GA. Ben MacDui (Talk) 20:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: GA review of Middlewich

You might also want to cross-reference Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements with information at WP:CITIES. While Middlewich is clearly not a major city, some of the subtopics and categories listed in the city wikiproject probably apply nonetheless. Dr. Cash 00:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new project: Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Waterways

Hello. Since you contributed to some of the material about canals in Cheshire, as well as providing the schematic of the Cheshire ring, I thought you might be interested to see the above new project has started up. DDStretch (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA for Middlewich

Thanks for the congratulations iro Runcorn. I see that you've done a lot more work on Middlewich and I've had a quick scan through the latest version which is looking good. I think you should get GA soon - good luck anyway. Peter I. Vardy 11:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wirral in First Battle of Middlewich

Hi,

I just realized that there is an article called Hundred of Wirral. Do you think this would be a better choice for disambiguating Wirral in First Battle of Middlewich? Thanks in advance for your time, Lisatwo 21:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Middlewich - Roman artefacts - Brooches.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Image-Middlewich - Roman artefacts - Brooches.jpg. The copy called Image:Image-Middlewich - Roman artefacts - Brooches.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Middlewich peer review

I've done a quick peer review on Middlewich -- looking at my comments I fear they look rather overwhelming, so I should stress that in my opinion the article isn't too far from GA and most of the changes suggested are cosmetic ones. Do ask if anything's unclear, though I don't frequent Wiki as often at weekends, so I might not answer immediately. Cheers, Espresso Addict 03:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Mid Cheshire Media

A tag has been placed on Template:Mid Cheshire Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Middlewich's GA review

Just in case you missed it, the Middlewich article has had its GA review at last, and there are just a few small things that need doing, so it's on hold for now. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was successful, congratulations! Espresso Addict (talk) 15:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cheshire newsletter

Delivered on 19 January 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

Questionnaire

In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.

1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?

Answer:

2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?

Answer:

3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?

Answer:

4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?

Answer:

4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?

Answer:

5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)

Answer:

6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?

Answer:

7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?

Answer:

8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?

Answer:

Possibly unfree File:Capt W H France Hayhurst.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Capt W H France Hayhurst.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salt - Skimmers.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salt - Skimmers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middlewich - Brunner Mond.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middlewich - Brunner Mond.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middlewich - Pepper Street Salt Works.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middlewich - Pepper Street Salt Works.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Middlewich - Cenotaph unveiling.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Middlewich - Cenotaph unveiling.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middlewich - Population.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middlewich - Population.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cheshire Ring Schematic.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Middlewich - Amans Salt Works.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middlewich - Amans Salt Works.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Middlewich - Murgatroyd lump salt store.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middlewich - Murgatroyd lump salt store.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salt - Saxa Salt container.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salt - Saxa Salt container.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]