User talk:Salemmaman
Welcome
[edit]
|
Welcome to Wikipedia | ||
 Hello, Salemmaman, and welcome to Wikipedia!
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Banjeboi 08:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Speedy deletion nomination of Knowthyneighbor.org
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Knowthyneighbor.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mhking (talk) 02:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- The article appears to be merely promoting what appears to be a non-notable Web site, and does not have independent, verifiable sources that provide supporting information regarding its notability. --mhking (talk) 03:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I beg to differ and anyone who bothers to read the article can see for themselves not only the notability of this group but can verify the many credible sources cited. The opposing group [1] has been on wikipedia unmolested since 2007, the constant deletion of the KTN article seems akin to discrimination against GLBT groups.Salemmaman (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)salemmaman
Articles for deletion nomination of Knowthyneighbor.org
[edit]I have nominated Knowthyneighbor.org, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowthyneighbor.org. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. mhking (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- I visited the link as you suggested and this was the only explanation you offered: "Self-promotion of margnially notable Web site". You say that I am welcome to edit the article to address these concerns, how does one rectify your claim that knowthyneighbor.org is marginally notable? I'd like to resolve this issue with you once and for all since I see this is not the first time you've nominated the article for deletion.Salemmaman (talk) 22:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- I previously nominated the article for speedy deletion under WP standards regarding notability. My nomination was denied by an admin. Under the standard articles for deletion guidelines, I have requested a further review of the article's notability. I stand by my prior assessment, in which I feel it is not notable for inclusion in Wikipedia (which is why I have nominated the article under the AfD process), however, I will stand by whatever the consensus is after the AfD process is concluded. I mentioned previously that the article may be edited; I would suggest a review of the notability guidelines at WP:N as a place to start. --mhking (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- "Within Wikipedia, notability refers to whether or not a topic merits its own article. Articles should verify that they are notable, or 'worthy of notice'. It is important to note that topic notability on Wikipedia is not necessarily dependent on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic—although those may contribute."
- "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources."
- "Wikipedia articles[1] should rely primarily on reliable, third-party, published sources (although reliable self-published sources are allowable in some situations - see below). Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. How reliable a source is depends on context. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made; if an article topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard for queries about the reliability of particular sources."
- We have cited several news sources (Boston Globe, The Advocate, Bay Windows, The Chicago Free Press, The Seattle Times, The Associated Press) to verify the notability, how many would you be satisfied with? There are many more out there, let me know how I can help you see the value of keeping this article alive.Salemmaman (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- I went through and brought up some of the news sources for this group so that the matter of notability could be settled:
KTN in the news:
http://www.nwanews.com/adg/News/258391/
http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/dpp/news/042809_Ark_Group_Wants_AntiGay_Petitioners_Kept_Secret
http://www.winknews.com/news/local/15751107.html
http://www.kgw.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8RDFLA80.html
http://www.thedalleschronicle.com/news/2007/09/news09-04-07-02.shtml
http://www.wickedlocal.com/brewster/archive/x563250007
http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=21122
http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/07-06/07-27-06/04state-region.htm
http://www.kcby.com/news/9548102.html
http://www.salemnews.com/punews/local_story_128094029
http://www.mywire.com/a/TheAdvocate/Aaron-Toleos-cool-gay-rights/5473217?extID=10051
http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Content?oid=39577&category=22101
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/this_just_in/documents/05177324.asp
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-2028.html
http://www.gloucestertimes.com/puopinion/local_story_270093950?keyword=topstory
http://it.peacereporter.net/articolo/5902/
http://www.eagletribune.com/puopinion/local_story_274093843?keyword=secondarystory
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/06/08/gloucester_lawyer_to_challenge_kerry/
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-140148376.html
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20060706/intimidation-tactics/index.html
http://www.thecabin.net/stories/043009/opi_0430090022.shtml
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/11/08/gop_director_uses_web_to_liven_the_party/
http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/07-06/07-02-06/01state-region.htm
http://www.americandaily.com/article/20034
http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/101807/met_209423458.shtml
http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid32973.asp
http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=20763
http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ci=108&ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=17450
http://www.floridabaptistwitness.com/6103.article
http://www.innewsweekly.com/innews/?class_code=Ne&article_code=4211
http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=52013
http://www.worcestermag.com/archives/2006/01-05-06/worcesteria.html
http://www.innewsweekly.com/innews/?class_code=Ne&article_code=2491
http://www.thebostonpilot.com/articleprint.asp?id=4583
http://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=5077
http://holebi.info/phpnews/kortnews.php?action=fullnews&id=3461
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-1718.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc3GBFn9_yY&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVQNLgscFJk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIPGAJTAc2o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_SjFQXspqk&feature=channel <====CNN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzgf7QSN3Qk&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMGUaCpmEPU&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ_YOzC5aSE&feature=channel <====KTN advocates on newsSalemmaman (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, you have shown plenty of reliable sources. I am formally withdrawing my objections and requesting the AfD be speedy closed with a ruling of Keep. --mhking (talk) 20:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)