User talk:Saleh Hamedi

Welcome!

Hello, Saleh Hamedi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Saleh Hamedi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Saleh Hamedi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the People's Mujahedin of Iran page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saleh Hamedi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! Pahlevun (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at People's Mujahedin of Iran, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pahlevun (talk) 12:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I gave a full explanation for all changes made. Kindly make any related comments on the Talk section and not on my user page. Saleh Hamedi (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Pahlevun (talk) 15:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saleh Hamedi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been accused of being a sock puppet of Newcomer1, which I'm not. Please note that all my edits on WikiPedia have been made with explanations in the Talk Pages. I'd ask you to show me one occasion when this hasn't been the case. I have to presume that the WikiPedia admin's are neutral. I have been editing the page related to Iran's main opposition group MEK. I gained an interest to edit this article after I read an article on the net with disinformation against the group and quoting WikiPedia as its source. Upon reading WikiPedia's description of the group I found that a lot of the same disinformation existed there too. After a little investigation I found that at least 1 user Pahlevun had been adding negative sentences against the group over a period of several months. I therefore decided to fix the sections that were blatantly wrong, and I ignored the sections that were more to do with people's opinion of the group. If you look at my log for example you'll notice that I kept correcting the section that claims that the MEK are on the terrorist list of the US, UK, Canada, Europe and Australia. They're not. Pahlevun kept reverting back whilst ignoring my comments in the Talk page which included links to news agencies such as Reuters pointing out that the courts had ordered these governments to de-list the group, which they did. So it is factually wrong of WikiPedia to state that the group is on these countries' terrorist lists. It's not a matter of one person's opinion against the other. They’re just not on the lists. The UN terrorist list meanwhile never listed the group in the first place. Pahlevun constantly reverted my changes and ignored all my explanations. I've not made too many edits on the page but if you look you'll see that all my changes came with notes in the Talk page. I should also tell you that the Iranian regime is known for its misinformation campaign to demonize the MEK, which is its main opposition group. Obviously inside Iran, people are executed for supporting the group. So I feel that at least on the open net, people should have the ability to get genuine factual details about the group which they cannot in Iran. When I first began to edit on WikiPedia, I read your rules and regulations and noticed that one must presume all parties are acting in good faith. Hence, you will notice that despite whatever I might feel, I've actually avoided labelling Pahlevun or anyone else for that matter as regime agents. Nonetheless, it's unfair to silence one side of the argument by blocking them particularly when for each edit they are giving specific reasons in the Talk page. I'd rather not be let down by WikiPedia, but even if you decide to keep a block, wouldn't it seem reasonable for me to ask you to take a read of the Talk page and fix the factually incorrect statements on the MEK page such as the claim that the group is on the terrorist lists. Furthermore, I ask you to give a quick read of the MEK page the way Pahlevun has made it. I'm pretty certain that like me you'll notice that it is extremely negatively slanted against the group. I’m open to answering any other questions from WikiPedia admins. Thanks.Saleh Hamedi (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You claim you are not a sockpuppet of Newcomer1. But we know you are. Same IP address, same computer. The rest of your unblock request doesn't address your sockpuppetry so is irrelevant. Yamla (talk) 14:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.