Jump to content

User talk:Salamanderman476

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Salamanderman476! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Húsönd 22:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quahog, Rhode Island (May 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Salamanderman476! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Family Guy and Peter's Progress. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

[edit]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Draft:Quahog, Rhode Island you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Italic text[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Quahog, Rhode Island has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Quahog, Rhode Island. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quahog, Rhode Island has been accepted

[edit]
Quahog, Rhode Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Salamanderman476. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter, Peter, Caviar Eater, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Salamanderman476. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive editing

[edit]

I have reverted your additions. The sources do not back the content, and you have even created fake headlines and used sources that do not contain the quotes in our text. Don't do that unless you want to get blocked for bad faith editing. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I DEFINITELY dont wanna get blocked because I love Wikipedia. It's the first website that pops up every time I look up something. My fault, it won't happen again. Salamanderman476 (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Just be careful in the future. I would advise that you get to know this place better, and the rules here, by editing uncontroversial topics for a while. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]