User talk:Salain
June 2016
[edit]For Kirovohrad, a RM was filed. Next move will result in a block of your account. Pls stop disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- (Ymblanter moved page Kropyvnytskyi to Kirovohrad over redirect: the user rationale has nothing to do with the policies; next move will be discussed at ANI).
- WFT? Discussed? you to used his official position for his own personal war edits? It is forbidden in Wikipedia. What kind of discussions in question, if the name change officially took place, and the title of the article is out of date?This name does not apply to title with questionable wording. This city has a specific name. Sorry for my bad english - I'm just learning.--Salain (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The requested move is on the talk page of the article. When you moved the article, without even checking its talk page, it was already there. We do not follow here the Ukrainian laws, and therefore the official change of the name is irrelevant (see Kiev). A general advise for a user with 15 edits would be to think twice before you do smth which suprisingly has not yet been done. Probably there are some good reasons why it has not been done.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- this is the laws of logic, not country. In such cases, simply need create a redirect from the old name. Article for Russia not called "USSR" only because many people still believe that Russia - is the Soviet Union. So, I will not argue, people be rename articles with time anyway.--Salain (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- I suggest that you familiarize yourself with our policies before continuing this discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- this is the laws of logic, not country. In such cases, simply need create a redirect from the old name. Article for Russia not called "USSR" only because many people still believe that Russia - is the Soviet Union. So, I will not argue, people be rename articles with time anyway.--Salain (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The requested move is on the talk page of the article. When you moved the article, without even checking its talk page, it was already there. We do not follow here the Ukrainian laws, and therefore the official change of the name is irrelevant (see Kiev). A general advise for a user with 15 edits would be to think twice before you do smth which suprisingly has not yet been done. Probably there are some good reasons why it has not been done.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- WFT? Discussed? you to used his official position for his own personal war edits? It is forbidden in Wikipedia. What kind of discussions in question, if the name change officially took place, and the title of the article is out of date?This name does not apply to title with questionable wording. This city has a specific name. Sorry for my bad english - I'm just learning.--Salain (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)