User talk:Salaamshalom

Zipporah

Hello, Salaamshalom.

Please understand that at Wikipedia any editor has the right to question any content. You should not be removing that cite request.

And make sure that you do not undo other useful changes when you revert over one detail. SamEV (talk) 01:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cite request was not need because the article gave the meaning. You write to me as if you had facts that suggested otherwise. You never tried to find the meaning all you did was challenge it, but base on what? You had no knowlege of it...Either way the sources have been provided. Salaamshalom (talk)

You can't go on doing this. I invite you to suggest some mechanism for resolving this dispute civilly. I'll suggest a way if you wish. SamEV (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing anything. Stop making senseless edits base on your so called implications and things that are not there Salaamshalom (talk)

I need to make this clear to you: disputes are supposed to be resolved civilly. That's non-negotiable policy at Wikipedia.

So if you wish to continue this dispute *you have to negotiate civilly*. Failure to do so could very well result in your being blocked.

Do not take that as in any way a threat, only as a needed warning. SamEV (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SamEV adding your opinions and so called implications to articles will get you blocked us well. Salaamshalom (talk) 20:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]