User talk:Sakura6977/Archive 1

Archive 1

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 13:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mir Najaf Ali Khan has been accepted

Mir Najaf Ali Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Verifiability

Please stop adding fake citations as you did here (and in earlier edits).

You are asserting that "Mir Osman Ali Khan donated 125 kgs of Gold to the temple", using three sources:

• The first source doesn't even mention the temple: it does contain an urban legend about a gold donation to the National Defence Fund which has subsequently been refuted.
• The second source was removed in the edit that you undid: it makes absolutely no mention of any gold -- all it says is that the Nizam donated Rs. 8,000 to the temple.
• The third source is makes no mention of any temple either: it just debunks the urban legend about the Nizam's gold donation to the National Defence Fund.

Have a look at WP:V and WP:RS. utcursch | talk 15:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please look at 4th para under The Hindu report : (copy pasted "as is") "The report also mentions a donation of 1.25 lakh grams of gold from the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and a purse of ₹8 lakh in cash from Telegu film stars to the government."

Please go through thoroughly see before pointing fingers at others!Sakura6977 (talk) 16:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Umm... what? Did you even bother to read the quote you posted? It talks about a donation from the temple to the government, not by the Nizam to the temple: "1.25 lakh grams of gold from the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and a purse of ₹8 lakh in cash from Telegu film stars to the government."

Not to mention that the other two links don't even mention the temple. utcursch | talk 16:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)