User talk:Sakshi115rathore
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Charan Singh, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]Your edit to Bhagat Dhanna has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your edits on Charan Singh
[edit]Recently you have made some edits on Charan Singh article, if you don’t mind can i ask why did you removed this ?
He was Member of Parliament (MP) for Baghpat and Singh was the first non-Congress man who formed government in the northern India and became 5th chief minister of Uttar Pradesh. Thanks. Happy Editing TheSlumPanda (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello ?? TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- You can add it again. I just removed it because it was redundant and already mentioned in early life. Regards. Sakshi115rathore (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- These are some imp. points about him so i added them again in lead section. Please do not remove them TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- hello. I am encountered some vandalism on bharatpur and maharaja surajmal page saying he belonged to rajput caste instead of jat. Can u please look into that. Sakshi115rathore (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sure i will try to revert vandal and thanks for letting me know about this. TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- hello. I am encountered some vandalism on bharatpur and maharaja surajmal page saying he belonged to rajput caste instead of jat. Can u please look into that. Sakshi115rathore (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- These are some imp. points about him so i added them again in lead section. Please do not remove them TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- You can add it again. I just removed it because it was redundant and already mentioned in early life. Regards. Sakshi115rathore (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]Your edit to Veer Teja has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Sakshi115rathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Sir/Ma'am. My IP address 80.82.76.0/22 got blocked as I had used VPN due to frequent internet shutdowns in my country. I request you to kindly restore it as I assure that I wont be using VPN while working on wiki articles as newbie. Hereby, I confirm that I am not web host provider and will make sure that such thing never happens again.
Decline reason:
Once you disable your VPN, you need to wait a full 24 hours for the Wikipedia block to expire. If you are still unable to edit after waiting a full 24 hours, please make a new request. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
May 2024
[edit]Your edit to Guru Ki Maseet has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bharatpur State. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Akshay Rotela (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Warning 2
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hindu Mahasabha, you may be blocked from editing. Akshay Rotela (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]Hi Sakshi115rathore! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Dalit that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. — Diannaa (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)- Hello Dianna, this is with regard to April 2018 protests edit. The addition of 2018 amendment act details is not violation of copyright as I have clearly mentioned the article and economic times data is for public usage and public domain in India. Also, mentioning about 2 main provisions of act (anticipatory bail and inquiry) is general data and cannot be considered copyrighted. So , how do I prevent this copyright violation as being claimed? Regards. Sakshi115rathore (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Sakshi115rathore. The webpage that was copied is this one, which is marked as "Copyright © 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved." You seem to have confused "publicly available" with "in the public domain". Copyright is the same worldwide, and applies in India just like it does in almost all countries. — Diannaa (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- but then how will I be able to add provisions of the act using an article because every article on this issue might have the copyright trademark. I mentioned the article in the references while adding provision. Also, what is the way to get blocking removed in wikipedia? Sakshi115rathore (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Copying content from your sources is not allowed. Prose you find online, in books, in magazines, and in newspapers is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. Everything you add must be written in your own words.In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:
- What is copyright?
- How is Wikipedia licenced?
- Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
- Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
- How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
- Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have answered the above question in the following manner:-
- 1) Copyright is a legal protection that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to its use and distribution, usually for a limited time. This protection applies to various forms of creative expression, including books, music, artwork, and software. Copyright laws ensure that the creator can control how their work is copied, distributed
- 2) Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which allows anyone to copy, distribute, modify, and even use Wikipedia content commercially, as long as they credit the original authors and share derivative works under the same or a compatible license.
- 3) Wikipedia prohibits the use of copyrighted content to avoid legal violations and to maintain its open and free-to-use nature. The inclusion of copyrighted material without permission could expose Wikipedia to legal action and undermine its mission of providing freely accessible knowledge.
- 4) Copyrighted content can generally be used under these circumstances:
- Fair Use: In some cases, a limited amount of copyrighted material can be used without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, or research.
- Public Domain: Works that are no longer protected by copyright (or never were) can be used freely.
- Licensing: If the content owner grants permission or licenses their work under a free-use license like Creative Commons, it can be used within the terms of that license.
- Permission: You can seek and obtain explicit permission from the copyright holder to use their work.
- 5) To avoid violating copyright policies, I adhere to the following practices:
- Use of Public Domain and Licensed Content: I only utilize content that is either in the public domain or explicitly licensed for reuse, such as Creative Commons-licensed works.
- Respect Fair Use Limitations: If using copyrighted material, I ensure it falls within "fair use" guidelines, such as quoting short excerpts for commentary or analysis.
- Avoiding Direct Reproductions: I do not copy and paste material from copyrighted sources. Instead, I summarize, paraphrase, or generate original content based on knowledge that is widely available.
- Regular Checks: I remain informed of copyright laws and content policies to ensure compliance in the future.
- Please help me unlock my account Sakshi115rathore (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Copying content from your sources is not allowed. Prose you find online, in books, in magazines, and in newspapers is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. Everything you add must be written in your own words.In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:
- but then how will I be able to add provisions of the act using an article because every article on this issue might have the copyright trademark. I mentioned the article in the references while adding provision. Also, what is the way to get blocking removed in wikipedia? Sakshi115rathore (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Sakshi115rathore. The webpage that was copied is this one, which is marked as "Copyright © 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved." You seem to have confused "publicly available" with "in the public domain". Copyright is the same worldwide, and applies in India just like it does in almost all countries. — Diannaa (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Sakshi115rathore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not violated copyright issue in April 2018 protests edit. Economic Times article is for public domain and I have clearly mentioned the source in the reference. Also, mentioning about 2 main provisions of act (anticipatory bail and inquiry) is general data and cannot be considered copyrighted. So , how do I prevent this copyright violation as being claimed? Regards So , how do I prevent this copyright violation as being claimed?
Decline reason:
The Economic Times article is marked "Copyright © 2024 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service". Also, I am not convinced by your argument that content is "general data and cannot be considered copyrighted". I think it can be considered copyrighted. PhilKnight (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.