User talk:Sakshi.shah123

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakshi.shah123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block explains that I have been using the profile for advertising services, however the account has been used to edit and add to articles things such as:

film and tv show explanations- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-only_park https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Leading_Citizen_(1939_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunrise_(How_I_Met_Your_Mother) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_culture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbershop_(film)

Things that are not particularly monetizable. This has been done in good faith. There were instances where changes being made were being flagged for flouting the content policies, I unfortunately understood how to navigate the talk page too late. The minute the issue was understood, the rectification was made and such instances stopped immediately. I have a proven track record of improving behavior to change in line with Wikipedia policy once the issue is highlighted. Please do consider the unban. thank you. Sakshi.shah123 (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please describe your connection, if any, with Sidharth Oberoi and the Alan Truman brand, or otherwise how you came to edit about them. You won't be unblocked to make further promotional edits, so we will need to know what edits you intend to make instead. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that you don't need to provide the whole url when linking to another Wikipedia article or page, simply place the title of the target in double brackets; [[Women-only park]] shows as Women-only park. Doing it this way keeps the page cleaner and doesn't lock readers into a version of Wikipedia they might not prefer(mobile or desktop). 331dot (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rithika Pandey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rithika Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rithika Pandey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 10:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Revant Himatsingka

Hello, Sakshi.shah123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Revant Himatsingka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nikhil Sharma

Hello, Sakshi.shah123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikhil Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viraj Mithani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Viraj Mithani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Article may be notable, however currently there is only one source in the article that may meet WP:SIRS additional sources are needed to show notability. Drafted as an alternative to deletion. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // Timothy :: talk 02:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Viraj Mithani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Viraj Mithani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 14:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viraj Mithani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viraj Mithani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viraj Mithani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]