User talk:Sajiky

Welcome!

Hello, Sajiky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1991 Houston Oilers season into 1991 Denver Broncos season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, didn't occur to me for some reason. Almost certain that was the first time I did that. I generally only make small edits for clarity and add appropriate links where needed.

Only reason I felt compelled to exert myself to the extent I did that time was because I am a huge Bronco fan and not having that great victory noted on said page for the Broncos seemed a tragic oversight that demanded rectification for the balance of the universe.

Actually more I think about it the more I can't believe that didn't occur to me. I know better. I'm fully aware of how attribution works, simply because I didn't think to apply it is no excuse. Not even so much for the actual minimal damage caused in this case, but simply because I'm smarter than that.

Sajiky (talk) 09:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Curtis ☃☃

I reverted your edits to Ian Curtis because you seemed to be adding snowmen (☃☃) to the text for unclear reasons. But on closer inspection your edits appear to be in good faith so I should not have reverted them with the rollback tool. I'm sorry for that. Haukur (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I got why you did it lol. I couldn't for the life of me figure out why that was happening. Something to do with my phone and Firefox I guess. I tried repeatedly to fix it myself. But it kept putting in paragraphs twice and adding those (snowmen?). By the time you came around and reverted it I was giving up anyway.

Editing on the phone is kind of a pain anyway for anything more than just plain text. Then later I realized I probably could have just cleaned up the snowmen (is that what they were? I was thinking they were mouse faces or something heh). Using the full editor instead of the visual one.

I appreciate you letting me know though.

Sajiky (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Allman Brothers Band original members.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Allman Brothers Band original members.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]