User talk:SaintOhrszy

January 2017

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nana Akufo-Addo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nana Akufo-Addo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nana Akufo-Addo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nana Akufo-Addo was changed by SaintOhrszy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861072 on 2017-02-07T14:33:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Sadio Mané.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Azure Awuni,

Hello SaintOhrszy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Azure Awuni, for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

_{Vermont | reply here} 13:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aaron Adatsi

Hello, SaintOhrszy. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Aaron Adatsi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Aaron Adatsi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

GMG^talk 12:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Adatsi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Adatsi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Adatsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Oswald K. Azumah

The article Oswald K. Azumah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources that discuss him significantly. Google search for "Oswald Azumah" or "Oswald K. Azumah" results in fewer than 100 listings, mainly of things he's written.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 14:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Oswald K. Azumah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oswald K. Azumah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oswald K. Azumah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 17:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bernard Avle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 17:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bernard Avle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

John Mahama

I've removed the AFD tag you placed on this article, because you did not specify why the article should be deleted. Normally, the president of a country is considered notable, so it looked like the tag may have been placed in error in this case. If you still believe the article should be deleted, please have a look at WP:AFDHOWTO and follow the steps there - including completing the deletion template and specifying reasons for why the article should be deleted. You can also head over to WT:AFD if you need assistance. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oswald K. Azumah, you may be blocked from editing. The editor whose username is Z0 10:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nigeria. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 10:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xnxx.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Xnxx.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:01, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xnxx

Hello SaintOhrszy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Xnxx for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Counsellor Lutterodt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counselor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)