User talk:Saint.Pierre.Pro

Speedy deletion of "The Ultimate Truth Behind 9/11 (website)"

A page you created, The Ultimate Truth Behind 9/11 (website), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the web site is under constructions, the article probably doesn't meet Wikipedia guideines. If you want it (the article) in your user space to work on, please let someone know; otherwise, it's likely to be deleted. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UTB911003.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:UTB911003.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia says do not be ashamed to occasionally make mistakes

In noticed your discussion at CT. I think you may have been apologizing for a mistake and I have two thoughts. First, somewhere among wikipedia policies (I can't find it now) it mentions to not be ashamed to occasionally make mistakes. In fact, it is the duty of other editors to be patient regarding such mistakes.

Second, to learn about what people mean by "relaible sources", type WP:RS into the search bar. If that is not correct, click this link --> wp:rs <---.

Examples of reliable sources are newspapers that were reliable in the past, and scholarly journals that were reliable in the past. Well, nobody claims to really know what was really reliable in the past, but they try to do their best, I guess.

--Ihaveabutt (talk) 04:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On what topic should I create a new article???

A foreign language version of wikipedia (or perhaps english) has a page somewhere which has a list of topics that people have proposed should be started as new wikipedia articles. If the page I imagine does exist in english wikipedia, that's your answer.

To find out you might try a help symbol right here. The help symbol is something like ((HELP)). When you save the symbol, automatically guides will arrive there (here), guided by the anchient and magical spirit of WIKILOVE, and the spirit guides will answer your question.

But, well, you can see my dilemma. If I type the symbol exactly perfectly correctly, then I will be invoking the spirits myself. It is a wikipower I don't wish to invoke unless its useful. See next section. --Ihaveabutt (talk) 05:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some people suggest topics for article creation. in WP, is there a list of such topics?

A foreign language version of wikipedia (or perhaps english) has a page somewhere which has a list of topics that people have proposed should be started as new wikipedia articles. Does such a list in english wikipedia? --Ihaveabutt (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Wikipedia:Requested articles. Enjoy!—C45207 | Talk 05:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bilingual?

If you are bilingual, I know something very useful tasks that can be done to expand the articles you are interested in. You can reply on my talk page. --Ihaveabutt (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC) <-- here[reply]

If you have any other questions, feel free to drop a note. --Ihaveabutt (talk) 05:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TRANSLATE