User talk:Saikano II~enwiki

Hi

Hi, again, Saikano. I'm glad you're going to try again, but remember that you're on a short leash. If I see any of the behavior that led to your previous blocks you will be blocked indefinitely without warning. Please do not test our limits. Leebo ^T/C 01:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Apparently you did not read my message above, or did not take me seriously. Your comments at Talk:Lolicon were exactly the kind of disruption you were blocked for before. I think I was optimistic to think you would stay away from lolicon/pedophile topics. Leebo ^T/C 14:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked........

Lele? stop! You dod not say anything about lolicon! I read your thing and the only thing im aware of that that i was blocked for is Bitching on talk pages and lacking edits! Please rething your block! and for once WAIT for a good reason to block(Vandal, spaming, linking to B.S., blahing over nonthing, ect...) now unblock me so I can get back to my edit on chesapeake, VA and my favorate youtube thing Idol Master ok?!--Saikano II 15:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leebo

Im sorry but...I cant stand this unfair treatment on this site! I told my family I love lolicon and they "litteraly" HATES ME and talks about my removal from my temporay living area! My friends have avoided me! My myspace fri...well I am unable to get to a Unfiltered Persocom so...

If Saikano provides a valid unblock request, the admin reviewing it can review his previous issues at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano. Leebo ^T/C 16:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK leebo a valid reason? Fine! I wish to be unblocked so I can resume my duties as an editor on wikipedia! I Have edits prepared for:

Now if I do anything else disruptive I will retire from editing and cont. over on Wikiquote and Anime-wiki thing! Just tell me what I did disruptive and I will retire wiki style (The template thing)! I assure you I will do better than I did a year ago! Hell Im going to "Anger Management" classes this Saturday afternoon! Trust me when I say, "I am not a threat!"

Saikano, I used the word valid in response to the fact that you used the wrong unblock template. See the reason why it was declinded. Leebo ^T/C 17:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saikano II~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Aside form the sock puppet thing, you really have no "good" reason to block me! Its obv. I want to change its that I just need some help getting use to the rules! I can change and I want to change but w/ the constant blocks I just dont see that happening! For once trust me! Hell look here 2! *Sigh* I will make reasonable edits and avoid the crap that got me blocked before if not WP:BAN me!

Decline reason:

Aside from the sockpuppet thing? The sockpuppet thing is sufficient to block this account indefinitely. Only the parent account may be considered for unblock consideration, not abusive sockpuppet accounts such as this one. You have clearly shown that you cannot change; if you could, you would not be continuing to violate policies such as WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. — Yamla 14:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Saikano II. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Saikano II~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)