User talk:Sahar410

This is Sahar410's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaveh Afagh (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to pass WP:ENT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaveh Afagh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kaveh Afagh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sahar410! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kaveh Afagh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kaveh Afagh. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaveh Afagh has been accepted

Kaveh Afagh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear "@Kvng:" Hope you are well. I don't know how I miss this important notification! But your notic is not show at the top of the article. The sources are not reliable & enough and cannot be verified & show he is not eligible. After deleting you have added no other source and just some untrue content that is untrue and exaggerated without reference and then the article is approved & published! He is not even famous in Iran, Iran has only two famous rock stars, 1.Reza Yazdani and 2.Kaveh Yaghmaei. In additional, as the author of the article, I am requesting the removal of the article because <redacted>. Thanks a lot Best wishes Kind regards Sahar410 (talk) 11:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahar410: we did try to delete this. See this discussion. There was not enough support to delete it. We can try again if you like. ~Kvng (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"@Kvng:" Thanks dear Kvng to your reply. That would be great if try again. Thank you so much to your helping & support. I appreciate you.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Proposed deletion of World of Metal Magazine

The article World of Metal Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable magazine: insufficient coverage in reliable, third-party sources per WP:GNG, WP:NMAG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaveh Afagh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaveh Afagh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaveh Afagh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Kvng (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Majid Saeedi

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed, including material that's been there for a while. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahar Ajdamsani

Hello Sahar410,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sahar Ajdamsani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 19:59, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Messaging users

Please don't leave messages on user pages, but on user talk pages. Also if you can provide enough secondary and tertiary sources to establish notability then I am sure that this user will change their minds. These sources don't have to be in English but do need to be about the subject and be independent of them. --Donald Trung (talk) 07:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I just saw that you've already wrote several accepted articles, excuse me for assuming that you didn't already know this. I can understand your frustrations, but please try to argue reasonably if you disagree with a deletion or simply request undeletion and provide enough sources to establish the subject's notability . --Donald Trung (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear Donald Donald Trung Hope you are well & thanks to your kind message. Music in Iran is forbidden and prohibition for women but she do, and if you read the sources you will find that many countries have written about this person that this is not the usual and there is very few artists in the world are at this level of globalization. She has coverage many reliable sources in many countries & she also has international awards & do importance at this young age. Specially she released world peace music album with collaboration 12 countries & UN 7 Unicef supported her album. The following is also my reasons for verifiable an article based on Wikipedia rules: Based on Wikipedia : Notability (music) , based on the following paragraphs, the notability is valid :

-Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

-Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.

-Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.

-Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

-Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.

-Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. -Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.

& based on general notability; f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.

& based on notability (people) People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published, secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject. e person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field. Also based on Wikipedia: Proof, Wikipedia: Referrals and Wikipedia: Neutral Perspectives, this article introduces an artist who has just introduced her & is Impartial and all the statements are referenced to reliable sources (valid news agencies from several countries that is shown her internationally recognized) and can be verified, & also articles of Iranian artists similar her are all confirmed and featured on Wikipedia. & also based on Wikipedia: the removal policy, this article is not eligible for removal. ( If order and need, I will translate all Persian news in English too ) Special thanks Best regards Sahar410 (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, first of all I hope that you are doing well too, and I think that through "WP:REFUND" you can ask for the article to be undeleted. Usually it's better to get more users to comment on it as usually the deleting admin has already made up his/her mind, or maybe the initial version of the article didn't contain the appropriate number of sources to showcase that they are in fact notable. There are plenty of people willing to help you. --Donald Trung (talk) 10:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Donald Donald Trung Unfortunately they deleted article. What is your opinion for now? Special thanks & much appreciate to your helping Best regards Sahar410 (talk) 11:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please click on "WP:REFUND", the article can be completely restored (un-deleted), all you have to do is put forth some convincing arguments why the subject of the article is notable and provide good independent links that prove her relevance and then someone will put the article back for you in Wikipedia. --Donald Trung (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much dear Donald Donald Trung Is this reasons that I wrote based on Wikipedia are good? Best wishes & kind regards Sahar410 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse my late reply as I am quite busy. First of all for whatever reason the pings don't seem to notify me, and second of all you will need to provide several URL's to prove notability, if you can get like, let's say 10 (ten) different sources covering different events where this subject is The main subject then I am quite sure that they will restore it for you. You can draft an undeletion request at for example 'User:Sahar410/DRAFT NAME" and then add plenty of external links there to provide notability. --Donald Trung (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Donald Donald Trung Please feel free. this article has more than 10 URL's of different sources & for this reason I wondered why they deleted it. I'm very thankful to you & appreciate your advise & do it. Best regardsSahar410 (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is odd indeed, there can be many reasons such as the sources not being reputable or related to the subject, I would just advise you to file an undeletion request and ask for clarification and what would be needed further establish notability. --Donald Trung (talk) 17:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will do because the sources was reputable & also related to subject. they deleted my article immediately after published & not read & check it & this is very unprofessional behavior Thanks a lot for giving me your time dear Donald Trung Sahar410 (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"@Donald Trung:" Hello dear Donald. Hope you are well. Unfortunately no one check my article from 3 months a go so far. I improved article & links & it's an acceptable article now based on wiki pedia. What can I do? Thanks you so much Best regards Sahar410 (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a little WP:BOLD and pushed in back to mainspace after fixing some bare URLs and cites and tweaking the prose a little. I've just noticed your user name is the same as the first name of the article and I have made the assumption your are not related or the subject of the article. (There may a tricky issue if there is due to WP:COI but it may not be insurmountable, just more difficult to handle). This only really needs a yes or no, thanks. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"@Djm-leighpark:" Hello dear Djm-leighpark Hope you are well. Thanks to your message. No, this article is not about me, it is about one of our artist in Iran. There is many people around the world with the same first name. I have this account from 4 years a go & I have some accepted articles in English Wikipedia & Persian Wikipedia. Best regardsSahar410 (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"@Djm-leighpark:" They deleted it! but why? Can you help me please for publishing it? Thanks a lotSahar410 (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Panic not .. Sahar Ajdamsani is there (at least at the moment) is it not? I Template:Db-g7'd the redirect from draftspace .. Draft:Sahar Ajdamsani .. to keep things tidy. I don't have the privileges to do a move without leaving a redirect so I have to do that. So I think things are good ... at least for the moment.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

dear"@Djm-leighpark:" the article was deleted a few moments ago, but now it looks like you have returned it again. Thank you so much. You are so kind. best regards Sahar410 (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Middle East Images

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Middle East Images, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 14:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI?

Hello, Sahar410. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sahar Ajdamsani, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Raised because of the comment: it is about one of our artist in Iran. Under absolutely no circumstances say anything that might identify yourself, it may be best to simply answer yes or no to this question. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sahar Ajdamsani. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]