User talk:SageGreenRider/Archives/2015/October
This is an archive of past discussions about User:SageGreenRider. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiffany Zhong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menlo Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for removing unverified content
[1] is exactly what I was referring to when I said it was unverified. --Ronz (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're welcome SageGreenRider (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Reference in David L. Jones article
( cut-paste to talk page) SageGreenRider (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
BLP says we need consensus for inclusion, correct?
Please help us find consensus, rather than restoring content. --Ronz (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- We already have a consensus to include the Cohen. The only point of contention is that you want to use the passive voice to redact the author's name. Such redaction has no bona fide basis in policy, BLP or non-BLP, whatsoever. SageGreenRider (talk) 16:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Do you honestly think your actions are for the sake of BLP? Or you using BLP guerilla tactics to bypass the spirit of the Keep AfD consensus and to deface the article and shrivel it to nothing? This is not a accusation, just a suggestion that you might want to reach into your soul and question your own agenda. SageGreenRider (talk) 22:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- So you cannot follow BLP then?
- If you cannot assume good faith and work cooperatively with others, then leave the article to those who can. --Ronz (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Will do. Good day to you, sir SageGreenRider (talk) 23:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)