User talk:Safwwefeeee

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Safwwefe (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeeee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT a sock of Safwwefe. I am just HIS BROTHER. WE ARE NOT THE SAME PERSON. Stop accusing me just because we have a similar name.

Decline reason:

And yet you post rubbish to John Reaves's page. Hmm. – Steel 20:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeeee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, I am NOT a sock of Safwwefe. I am his brother. And what does rubbish to John Reaves got to do to being a sock? I was just testing for fun. I will not make those kinds of edit again. I will only contribute to Wikipedia in a good way. LEAVE ME ALONE.

Decline reason:

Surely you don't expect anyone to believe you? Anyway, you leave us alone or this page will be protected. — John Reaves (talk) 20:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeeee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a sock of Safwwfe. It is the same person. What I have done is wrong. Can I please be unblocked. Safwwefe made mostlt good edits with some bad edits. I will not make any more bad edits. Can you unblock me, Safwwefe and Safwwefeasd. We are all the same. Safwwefeeee 23:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you're in a hole, please stop digging. Creating more sockpuppets does not improve your position. Go without socks for awhile, and there may be a chance of an actual review. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeeee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SAFWWEFE RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Decline reason:

Unblock abuse. — Yamla 19:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwwefeeee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I am a sock and have made many inappropriate edits and sock accounts from 2007 to 2009. However, I also made positive contributions. Now, it's 2013, I have matured, and plan on only making positive edits. Please give me another chance. I have not edited wikipedia from 2009 to 2013, it's been 4 years. I have changed.

Decline reason:

As User:Safwwefe, you are permenantly banned (as well as blocked) from editing Wikipedia. You may appeal your ban by contacting the Abitration Committee. None of your accounts - certainly not sockpuppet accounts such as this one - will be unblocked whilst the ban remains in force. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.