User talk:Safiel/Archive 4

Misplaced comment

Is it ok I finish the article and then we can discuss what we do with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgi.kapanadze (talk • contribs) 14:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misplaced comment

Hi, I don't know why my deletion didn't get a comment but it was nominated because it was a biography with no sources and no indication of notability. I think that constitutes grounds for deletions. Any opinion would be nice...Zzaffuto118 (talk) 02:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Celine Buckens

Hi Safiel. I've removed the PROD notice you placed on this article. I agree she fails WP:NACTOR, but there's enough coverage out there to scrape a pass of the GNG, which is just as valid. I've no objection if you want to take it to AFD instead; it's pretty borderline at the moment. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TAlkback

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, i appreciate your suggestions....Mormonfaith101 (talk) 02:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Allen West (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Rooney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Adams

Just a heads up. You should have refrained from closing the above referenced discussion. Non-admin closures are not appropriate when the closing editor has a conflict or has participated in the discussion or shared their opinion about an article in any manner. For further information and guidance, you can refer to WP:NAC. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 09:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo 204 accident

It does not matter, in the context of Walter Mondale's Senate career, that the planned Apollo mission that ended in tragedy before it began, is today commonly (and officially) known as Apollo 1. "The Apollo 204 Accident" is historically more correct, as that was the official title of the Senate committee's report. This, in turn, was taken from NASA's own designation of its "Apollo 204 Accident Review Board". Even though the astronauts wore "Apollo 1" on their patches, NASA managers had not come to terms with solidifying a naming scheme and were still thinking in terms of "204". The official redesignation of the mission as Apollo 1 (April 25, 1967) was made after their review board issued its final report (April 5), and the Senate of course took all year to finalize their investigation of NASA, all the time using 204. Readers can follow the wikilink to the Apollo 1 article and see the explanation of all this. Please consider the reversion of your edit. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

André Cusaco

When there's an inadequate article like this, but there's a corresponding article in another Wikipedia, it's well to check that first before placing a deletion tag, for it will normally shown clear notability , and just need translating--this is especially true if its an article about someone of that national origin or career, as here. Sometimes, of course, our standards and their standards may not match, but usually they do--if they do not seem to, AfD or prod is the way to go, preferably after adding whatever information there is; sometimes the other article is clearly inadequate also--google translate is usually enough to see--and then a speedy or other deletion as appropriate is justified. DGG ( talk ) 01:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions of Bridget Shergalis

Hi! Thanks for your efforts in seeking out and nominating articles for speedy deletion. Just a quick reminder - it is a requirement that when you tag an article for speedy deletion, you should google the subject to check weather it is important or not. I have declined the deletion of Bridget Shergalis because after a quick google i found that its important. Thank You. --Yasht101 (talk) 06:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Elissa F. Cadish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las Vegas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bios Urns listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bios Urns. Since you had some involvement with the Bios Urns redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Safiel (talk) 03:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted...

Thanks for spotting Arthur Woodall (musician) as a copyvio. I'm normally quite good when it comes to checking submissions for copyvio, but on this occasion, I neglected to do so. I have trouted myself! Pol430 talk to me 22:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding speedy deletion tag you put...

Just wanted to know the reason for speedy deletion tag you have put on the page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBASkool. I represent the MBASkool team and just came to know about the page and also the speedy deletion tag put by you. Just let us know whats the exact reason so that i can put it on Author's talk page if it can be corrected. Right now its affecting us. Looking forward to help from you. Kindly give the reason on mbaskool wiki page talk page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:MBASkool. -Divijsaharia (talk) 05:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

spi

from the khan article. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cool_Angel if you want to comment.

Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. Article

I have restored the Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. article to WikiProject Missouri following your recent edits to that article's Talk page, because he meets the inclusion criteria for WikiProject Missouri as a judge in the state. As a general rule, the decision to include an article in a WikiProject is made by Wikipedians affiliated the WikiProject in question. In this case, if you have any questions regarding Limbaugh's inclusion in WikiProject Missouri, please feel free to ask me or post a question on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.2.110 (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help on the Mike Martinez page. Someone that seems to be close to him is trying to censor the page. That seems common of a lot of politicians and their workers. TexianPolitico (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a !vote from an AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forward (Obama–Biden campaign slogan)

In the future, rather than removing a !vote from an AFD as you did with this edit: [1] with the comment that it was unsigned and misplaced, please either leave it alone, or move it to its proper place at the bottom of the postings , or check the page history and use the template to identify the editor or IP who placed it. It was by 4.79.204.118 in this edit. Thanks. Edison (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The canvassed SPA crowd often place their !votes near the top and rarely sign them. I am just going through and checking for any inadvertent deletions of text. Thanks. Edison (talk) 18:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Admin Noticeboard Discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you are mentioned in a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/#Censorship_of_Obama_Talk_Page_Discussions_-_Proposing_Ban_on_Frank.2C_Wikidemon.2C_and_DD2K. --98.220.198.49 (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Just what kind of bullshit are you trying to pull, anyway, declaring a Congressman re-elected when the election hasn't yet occurred?? -- JeffBillman (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]