User talk:Sadiq Khan.M

if you wish to appeal this block further please contact WP:BASC. 18:03, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

Welcome

Hello, Sadiq Khan.M, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!-- The Red Pen of Doom 16:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To me, that looks like a pretty textbook answer, and I'd have no problem unblocking you. However, given the history of this block I've asked that Future Perfect and/or Boing! said Zebedee look over the request themselves before unblocking. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

You have been blocked from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You either do not understand or just do not care to try and understand what copyright is and why we do not allow copyright violations to be posted here. The very first thing you did after removing all the previous discussion about copyrights from your talk page was to go and add a fresh violation to an article. we don't need contributions from users whose abilities stop at being able to copy someone else's work and paste it into a Wikipedia article. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiq Khan.M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jayron32 03:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{helpme}}

What's your question? Please note that we are not going through all this nonsense with empty helpme and empty unblock requests again - if I see another one with no actual content, you will be losing the ability to edit this talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiq Khan.M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please now i understand how to write Wikipedia article. Here After i never do any mistake and copyright violations to be posted here. Please i like to write article on Wikipedia about Tamil film media person and movies article please guide me write. Please

Decline reason:

You said that last time you were blocked. And repaid our faith in you with more copyright violations. Unblocking you again would be a bit too many last chances, don't you think so? Max Semenik (talk) 15:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiq Khan.M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Max Semenik (talk)yes sir i understand that , Last time also i never copy photo image. just i copy some article from the website and paste it. Now i understand here after i never copy any thing form websites , I write on my own please.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but that's enough last chances. After you finally formulated a decent unblock request last time I went out on a limb and unblocked you, but since your very next mainspace edits (to Vazhakku Enn 18/9) were direct and blatant copyright violations, it's clear that you are either unable to understand Wikipedia's copyright policies, or unwilling to abide by them. Either way, I see no benefit to the project in unblocking you again, and plenty of potential harm. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As the blocking admin I would say that I would want to see more solid evidence that this user has at least a basic understanding of what copyright is as this is their fourth block for copyvios. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Also, because the editor clearly has difficulty with the English language, I would suggest moving on to another Wikipedia project in a more familiar language. Wikipedias exist in many languages, and generally don't have a huge set of rules like the English Wikipedia has. Based on Sadiq Khan's bio, I suggest the Tamil Wikipedia at http://ta.wikipedia.org for example. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiq Khan.M (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Give me last change to improve . I know i do lots of mistake on Wikipedia. give one more chances for me. Check my contribution on Wikipedia i love to write article on film media peoples and movies.

Decline reason:

You already had a last chance and used it to violate copyright policy. Given your limited command of the English language there are also competence issues. I suggest you edit in a wikipedia in your own language. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Movie still 18 vayasu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Movie still 18 vayasu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]