User talk:Saderocks

Welcome!

Hello, Saderocks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Lindsay Lohan

Thank you for your edit to this article; it has been reverted. One, there was no reliable source for the information; two, unless notability can be directed toward the original artist—for example, if that artist significantly assisted the artist covering the song(s)—the data does not belong on the original artist's page. Feel free to write me if you have any questions. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 02:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sade Faison

All of the sources cited for this artist are sites where anyone can add a page for themselves. They do not constitute, under Wikipedia standards, Reliable Sources. -- Fan-1967 20:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not repost deleted material

You have recently re-created the article Sade Faison, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Fan-1967 22:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your comment at Cassie

An encyclopedia is not meant to be "interesting." Not to mention that people have different ways of interpreting "interesting." Do you even read this page? Do you know how to sign your comments? I suggest you read the wikipedia policies before you edit. If you don't like what you see at Wikipedia:Five pillars you should probably leave. mirageinred 00:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Faison

A tag has been placed on Stefan Faison, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Missvain 16:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add deliberately false information into Wikipedia. It is considered Vandalism. (The part of Ned in Nancy Drew is played by Max Thieriot.) Fan-1967 16:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Stefan Faison, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 22:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Stefan Faison. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks.

We're tired of your nonsense articles, with made up credits. Just stop it. Fan-1967 22:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism of Talk:Nancy Drew (film)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Fan-1967 22:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalizing

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 22:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of repeated vandalism to Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. – Ian Cairns 22:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]