User talk:SadarMoritz
Welcome
[edit]
|
Image tagging for Image:Mario Kasun - Croatia.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Mario Kasun - Croatia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Group of Croatian men in club of town Joliet Illinois.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Group of Croatian men in club of town Joliet Illinois.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Mario Kasun - Croatia.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Mario Kasun - Croatia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 05:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Kreso Cosic.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Kreso Cosic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
The file Image:Group of Croatian men in club of town Joliet Illinois.jpg has an uncertain copyright status and may be deleted. You can comment on its removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosmof (talk • contribs) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Drazen Petrovic.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Drazen Petrovic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Arijan Komazec.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Arijan Komazec.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Johhny Borrell.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Johhny Borrell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Rudy Tomjanovich.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Rudy Tomjanovich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Your bizarre and unexplained edit to the Robert Pattinson page has been reverted. You have provided no reason whatever for this edit, which reverted my own edits, which were explained at length on the Pattinson talk page, which I recommend you read first. Please review WP:BLP and WP:FANSITE as well. If you continue in this vein I will have no choice but to seek assistance from an administrator as I take this matter very seriously. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com
Reverts
[edit]Please, stop your blink reverts on Novak Đoković. On talk page we have discussion, so until we agree there, no entry should be inserted. --Tadijaspeaks 11:43, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Donald Trump
[edit]Your personal opinion regarding sources is not the point nor is it a valid reason for making spurious rvs. If you were truly interested in researching the subject and learning the most accurate version and the truth of the matter you would by now have checked out Trump's talk page (at Talk:Donald Trump) and read the sections entitled "Need Citation that Donald Trump is Catholic" and "Reformed Church in America?". Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- I note that you promised in May 2010 to provide your user profile. It's not necessary to do so, of course, but since you promised you should fulfill your promise. You're not fooling anyone, as your agenda is clear. I would also add that given your reversions, which have been contested and disputed, and the unsourced/improperly sourced images you have provided, which have since been deleted, that your edit history is one of borderline vandalism. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- "Your opinion about sources present is the only one that is personal, around here" -- this, of course, is nonsense. You simply ignore anything you don't like, such as the extensive debate on the Trump talk page about the near impossibility of Trump being Catholic, based on everything from his church attendance to his divorces to the fact that there is no reference anywhere on the World Wide Web to either of his parents or any of his siblings being Catholic. I don't know why you persist in this nonsense. You tried the same thing with Robert Pattinson, remember? Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have decided that it makes no sense to continue in this vein. Please see the BLP Noticeboard regarding this matter. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Tomic discussion
[edit]Hello, just a note to let you know that there is a discussion at Talk:Bernard Tomic#Let's settle this, which you may be interested in participating in. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Kivanc Tatlitug
[edit]The only true reliable source is where he or his family member is quoted about their ethnic origin. Not just a website of country X that claims something. If so he would have stated it in one of the thousand interviews he gave in the domestic media, not a website in country X. If you see that as a reliable source i hope you choose better sources when you research something for your job or study. As a person that has his roots in the same region of where Kivanc Tatlitug is from, i can assure you that in our region there are no Turks of Balkan origin. That a Bosnian or Croatian website claims should ring bells, don't take everything on the internet for granted: lesson 1 internet research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janicar (talk • contribs) 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Slavoljub Eduard Penkala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dutch
- Živa Kraus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Painter
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Just to let you know that I'll be nominating this article for the Did you know section. What it needs is a "hook" (an interesting fact about the subject), and it'll probably be the fact that he was the first rabbi serving in Zagreb in more than 50 years, or something like that. I'll add it to the article this evening, but you're of course free to beat me to it... GregorB (talk) 07:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Just nominated it. GregorB (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Tom Rosenthal
[edit]It appears that the Tom Rosenthal story is considerably more complex than it seemed. His paternal grandparents were actually quite famous - Albrecht Rosenthal, a German Jewish bookseller, and his British-born wife, Maud Ruth (Levy). There is no question that Maud's father, writer Oscar Levy, was Jewish. I am just not sure whether her mother, German-born Frieda Brauer, was Jewish as well. If she was not, that could help explain why Jim Rosenthal does not self-id as Jewish (i.e. his maternal grandmother would be non-Jewish in this scenario). Pretty clear that Tom's mother, born Christine Smith, is not Jewish. His father's genealogy is here. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Kotel Da-Don
[edit] | On 3 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kotel Da-Don, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Da-Don took the office of chief rabbi of Croatia in 1998, more than fifty years since the last office-holder? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kotel Da-Don.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dragan Plamenac, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0016_0_15847.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 23:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Ben Schwartz and BLPN
[edit]This is to let you know that I've opened a discussion about your recent edits to the Schwartz article at BLPN.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Citing on Jasenovac article
[edit]I assume you are aware of WP:CITE if you have been on WP since 2007. Please properly cite all material on this article. Referring editors to other articles is not in accordance with the relevant WP policy. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. My apologies if I have been a bit terse. That article is in poor shape and due to its controversial nature, inline citations are pretty much needed for everything. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reuven Yaron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Šandor Alexander.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Šandor Alexander.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Bbrezic – please pardon my bad English – I go not conform with your reversion of some of my changes in Živa Kraus. Some arguments:
- In Anti-Fascist Council of the People's Liberation of Yugoslavia#Second session of the AVNOJ (November 21 to November 29, 1943) we read: "The decisions and the resolutions of the second AVNOJ conference were: to create a federal Yugoslavia". Not: to declare any concrete form. No other decision seems to result from the resolutions of 21 November 1944.
- In Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia we find: "After the Kingdom was occupied during World War II, AVNOJ announced in 1943 their intention to rebuild the country as Democratic Federal Yugoslavia (DF Yugoslavia, DFY), leaving the question of republic or kingdom open." I don't know, is this a state name, really used? It was at first the intention only, to build it... But it makes some sense, to use it anyway. (To use "Republic of Yugoslavia", as some articles in the Wikipedia do, seems to me inappropriate for this time.)
- In this article we find the notice "on 26 June 1945, the country signed the United Nations Charter using only Yugoslavia as an official name, with no reference to either a Kingdom or a Republic".
- At 31 January 1946 the state was declared officially as "Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia (FPR Yugoslavia, FPRY)". This seems to be decided at 29 November 1945 from the new Constituent Assembly of Yugoslavia, so it makes sense to use this name since this date.
- The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFR Yugoslavia, SFRY) has been declared at 7 April 1963. (I remember it a little bit.)
It is normal, that in changing times notions and names are fluid ones. But for the birth date of Živa Kraus, 4 October 1945, in my opinion the names "Yugoslavia" or "Democratic Federal Yugoslavia" seem to be appropriate. (But I will not change it again, it's not my theme now.)
Greetings, Griot-de (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Danijel Ivin
[edit]Hello Bbrezic,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Danijel Ivin for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cmckain14 (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Željko Reiner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Have you got any more information on this picture such as when or where it was taken and by whom? The reason I ask is there is a good change it may well be copyright expired given the subject died some 95 years ago aged quite a bit older than he appears in the shot. LGA talkedits 01:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply, one more question when was the book published ? LGA talkedits 19:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
- My gut feeling is the picture is most likely out of copyright, works for hire (which this probably is) the copyright normally expires 120 years after it was produced, so in this case if it was produced before about 1892, however it may due to a little quirk in the rules be copyright until 2019. LGA talkedits 22:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 20:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
LGA talkedits 20:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Weissberg familija.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Weissberg familija.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Weissberg familija.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Weissberg familija.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barrett Pall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Etnografski muzej.jpg missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for April 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavko Hirsch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages University of Prague and Glina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Re'uven Dafni.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oliver Cheshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hollister and Gap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ivan Merz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emil Stock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Filip Deutsch may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herman Ehrlich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vuka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Adriana Altaras has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taroaldo ✉ 23:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirko Breyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Re'uven Dafni.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Re'uven Dafni.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Nomination of John Schlossberg for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Schlossberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Schlossberg (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hekerui (talk) 11:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Thea Altaras
[edit]Hi, I'm Schwindy. SadarMoritz, thanks for creating Thea Altaras!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A lot of good information. Just requesting some clean-up on the language (more encyclopedic, not essay). Also, more specifics on dates with good citations/footnotes. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Schwindy (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikilinking
[edit]Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
This even applies for infoboxes, too.
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 11:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Inappropriate basis for reporting
[edit]It is inappropriate to report someone to an admin over a content dispute. You can ask an admin on a talk page for his/her opinion on content, though. It would be much more appropriate to ask for opinions on content than to report for content disputes. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. → Call me Hahc21 04:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
SadarMoritz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not the only one who broke the three-revert rule in this edit warring. Category I have added was in the accordance with the Wikipedia rules, other user was the one who started edit warring by reverting my edit. And what about his too often edits on John Schlossberg page, which clearly backfilleds the site of recent changes.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
File permission problem with File:Aaron Altaras.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Aaron Altaras.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kidnapping and murder of Eliyahu Asheri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenelg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Novak
[edit]Zamolio bih te da ne ubacujes nacionalisticke stvari u clanak o Novaku Djokovicu! On nema veze sa Hrvatima, sportistima nije mesto za takve stvari, a njegova majka vec dugo vremena zivi u Srbiji. Uz sve to, Kurir nije relevantatn izvor i ne moze se smatrati ispravnim. Dosta je bilo nacionalizma, Novak nema veze sa Hrvatskom i Hrvatima. Pozdrav.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- Jos jednom bih te zamolio, nemoj moje izmene ponistavati, onome nije mesto u clanku o Novaku. Ovo je enciklopedija a ne nacionalisticki pamflet.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nije mi problem, ali shvati da takve stvari nemaju veze sa Novakom. Nije u redu tako nastupati, Kurir nije relevatan izvor, a Novak nikada nije pricao o tome. Da se on sam izjasnio, onda u redu, on nikada nije pricao o naciji svojih roditelja, ni u jednom relevantnom izvoru. Zato nema razloga ubacivati netacne i nepotrebne podatke u njegov clanak.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Please you stop with your disruptive behavior or I will be forced to ask for administrator intervention against vandalism. You are nationalism and tendentiously in this article. Please stop, Novak doesn't have anything with Croatia or Croats.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Leon Geršković.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Leon Geršković.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Keith Broomfield has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, SadarMoritz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nicholas Markowitz with siblings.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Nicholas Markowitz with siblings.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Just a heads up: a number of articles recently ended up in a cleanup category, the full list can be found here. I've fixed Edo Šen like this - if you agree this is OK I'll continue with fixing the rest in the same manner. GregorB (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Keith Broomfield for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Broomfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CUPIDICAE💕 01:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Order of Danica Hrvatska recipients has been nominated for listification
[edit]Category:Order of Danica Hrvatska recipients has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish people of Croatian-Jewish descent
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Polish people of Croatian-Jewish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Barrett Pall
[edit]
Hello, SadarMoritz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barrett Pall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Barrett Pall
[edit]
Hello, SadarMoritz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Barrett Pall".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Brazilian people of Croatian-Jewish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Croatian people of Moroccan-Jewish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Croatian people of Moroccan descent
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Croatian people of Moroccan descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bjelovar Synagogue.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bjelovar Synagogue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Koprivnica Synagogue.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Koprivnica Synagogue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
