User talk:Sabymed

April 2018

tutorpixie.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MER-C 15:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is response to your above thought about my inclusion of a Vegas as a society. This society is government registered operational society and has been listed under the right topic. This is a not for profit society registered as per State government rules. There is no gain in advertising this society except social reasons. If the other societies listed are legal then we would be telling a lie be not listing this society. Please let me know if you need any kind of authentication to prove that this is a registered society like the other entities listed under the topic. I declare that there is no gain or profit or advertisement motive behind this listing since it itself is a not for profit entity. Please go into proper investigation before declaring such statements. Since there was scope for editing I did so. Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabymed (talk • contribs) 12:15, April 21, 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabymed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I wish to tender my sincere apologies. Sir, you must have noticed that I am not a regular contributor. So, even now I am not even 10% familiar with the wiki interface. However, I don't want to disown my mistakes owing to lack of reading wiki regulations. To be frank, I didn't even know that when inserting an information (unless we are very sure) on an existing article it may lead to disruptive editing. I was of the opinion that writing on a new topic or including information into an existing topic were one and the same. My sincere apologies for ignorantly doing it on 2 topics. I wasn't even aware that the 'revert edit' messages where from admins. My undo of the revert edits were also because i simply saw an option and I went ahead and clicked 'undo'. Again an act of ignorance and nothing else. All that I want to say is "i'll avoid all such mistakes in future" but it will take me some time before I can get used to the wiki interface. Should you decide in allowing me to contribute further, I wish to prove myself with new topics and fresh content and avoid anything that sounds like self promotion or advertising. Whatever be your decision, Mr. MER-c please accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience. Sebastian Peter (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for spamming, not edit warring. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sabymed/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Sabymed/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Wasell^(T) 14:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]