User talk:Sabi43

Click here if you wish to leave me a message Welcome!

Hello, Sabi43, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your message

I'm good, thank you. I hope you're feeling good as well. :) SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup I'm also well n gud........:)Sabi43 (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not earning from Wikipedia as this website is %100 free and is non-profit. Also, Wikipedians use username signatures, not photos as the pixel sizes would slow the system. SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a user on Commons so I can't unblock you, and the block entry states you were blocked for copy violations. You would have to perhaps mention to Martin H. on Commons. SwisterTwister talk 20:57, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but I want a signature image instead of my written signature--Sabi43 (talk) 11:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sabi43. You have new messages at Entropy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Bilal Khan(Singer)

The article Bilal Khan(Singer) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

You asked on my talk page about evidence. The standards for evidence on Wikipedia is the guidelines on reliable sources. The key thing to understand is that sources need to be reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. An excellent example of such a source is an article in the New York Times. Good luck, Sparthorse (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Amanat Ali1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Amanat Ali1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sparthorse (talk) 08:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection of Babar Iqbal

This edit of yours is inappropriate. First, you cannot apply semi-protection to a page, only an administrator can. Tagging a page as semi-protected when it is not, is misleading for other editors and generally disruptive. Please do not add misleading tags to the page. You can request semi-protection of a page at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, but Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit and we only apply semi-protection when absolutely necessary. Given there has been no vandalism of the article, it would be inappropriate to request that it be protected. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 09:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks.:)Sabeel : Talk 11:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

S. Tariq Shahab

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of S. Tariq Shahab, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://mar.nova.org/html/dr__s__tariq_shahab.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You've been blocked for abusing mulitple accounts and block evasion. Ged UK 13:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did u me blocked ?please explain briefly.. Thanks Sabeel : Talk 13:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabi43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, i was not unknown to this type of abusing, i will never do this again please unblock me Sabeel : Talk 13:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what "i was not unknown to this type of abusing" is supposed to mean, but if it means that you didn't know that it was unacceptable to evade a block by creating a new account, then you know now. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked then you should request an unblock of your original account. However, you have used this account to do more of the same kind of thing that your previous account was blocked for, so there is even more reason now for the block to be kept in place than there was before, and so such a request is unlikely to succeed. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabi43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, i was not unknown to this type of abusing, i will never do this again please unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Repeating the identical unblock without actually addressed why you were blocked is never going to succeed. Please read WP:GAB and act accordingly. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In List of schools in Pakistan, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page La Salle High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]