User talk:Sabhajeet Chandel

May 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. utcursch | talk 18:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sockpuppet, i just want to spread history

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabhajeet Chandel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet, i want to be unblocked, I edited with only source from inscription translation you can check sir. I didn't voilate just edited with sources. I think some admins want to support that Chandelas were gonds by reverting my edit which proves that Chandelas were not gond or bhar origin (as per Akbarnama she's married to kachhwaha Rajput, l Theory) i don't know why but they support British debunked claim and don't let me spread my clan history by saying I'm sochpuppet, please unblock me

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. See also User talk:Anshu Singh Chandel. Yamla (talk) 20:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabhajeet Chandel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me I'm not sockpuppet, I'm just spreading me history with sources what is your problem?

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sabhajeet Chandel (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]