User talk:SabbathForever2007

Edits to Black Sabbath albums

Thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately, your changes were determined to be not helpful, and reverted.

Please read Wikipedia:Albums#Credits for information on how album credits should be arranged. / edg Edgarde *2 02:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Band credits

How is the reader supposed to tell between an actual band member and a session musician? This is the issue here.

Lineups of "actual band members" are documented pretty extensively on the Band page, and very specifically on List of Black Sabbath band members. / edg Edgarde *2 02:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers

I strongly recommend you not upload album covers.

Those will be deleted — under current Fair Use guidelines, pictures of the album covers are considered decoration, and not Fair use — leaving an empty link on the album pages. / edg Edgarde *2 02:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you actually trying to say that album covers aren't allowed on Wikipedia? Album covers are not allowed on discography pages because they are decorative. The are allowed on the actual album cover pages. If they aren't, well you have a lot of deleting to do, as every album in history on Wikipedia has a cover on it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SabbathForever2007 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the spirit of cooperation — which is how Wikipedia is edited — it would be considerate of you to not make more work for other editors to do. / edg Edgarde *2 02:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: You just got owned

Go ahead and wipe that pie off your face while I continue to follow the rules of WP: ALBUMS. Have a great day! (SabbathForever2007 20:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Following the rules? That's a fantastic development. Thanks! / edgarde (talk contributions) 03:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sabbath Album covers

Thanks for uploading these, BTW Don't forget the brown M&M's in a glass ;-) Sfan00 IMG 14:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern about your username

Hello, SabbathForever2007, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you. TonyWonderBread 03:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/SEGA (3rd), you will be blocked from editing. Please don't mess with sock reports about yourself... it only increases your chances of being blocked. If you're innocent, then make your case rather than vandalizing. Thanks! Gscshoyru 14:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Edgarde, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 14:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat bans

Dude, you've had a lot of accounts banned. If you want to take it out on me, that's fine, and certainly won't hurt anything. But it's behaviors like this (not to mention this) and attitudes like this that get you banned — not anything I do.

In the spirit of assuming good faith, I should add if you really believe the accusations you made in Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/SEGA (3rd),[1] [2] [3] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents would be a good place to make a report. / edg ☺ ★ 14:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Black Sabbath Live At Last.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Black Sabbath Live At Last.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SabbathHeaven.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SabbathHeaven.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SabbathBox.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SabbathBox.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]