User talk:Sabahmani

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sabahmani. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bahmani Sultanate, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well the neutral point of view?. There are many long running hoax still unresolved in wikipedia. I tried best for you to identify me. I cannot login to my previous account. May be i was deleted, so I created a new one. I dont even get an email if there are changes done.

I guess Wikipedia is spreading wrong information and moderators are playing tricks on users.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syed A. Bahmani, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kautilya3 (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its me again why would I do sock puppet. I do not know about Wikipedia much. However there are mistakes done with no evidence. Either remove that Brahmin part of Give the proof (Author + page number). Conflic - Syed A. Bahmani (check me on linkedin).

Well, you have to use a single account. Since I have reported you, your best bet is to go the investigation page, admit your mistake, and agree not to use two accounts.

You also have a conflict of interest for this article. So you should not edit it. However, you can go to the article talk page and explain your concerns, and one of us will take care of them. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay my friend, I will use this account permanently. Please remove the brahmin part if there is no evidence. Thanks. I have been challenging users who update that part, but nobody came up with proper author + books page number (reference).