User talk:Sa cooke

Image tagging for Image:Stairtex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stairtex.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stairs-WGSG-CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stairs-WGSG-CD.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Shepherd

Thank you for your recent help by contributing to the Sea Shepherd page. I notice that you're a relatively infrequent Wikipedia contributor, so I'll also leave this standard template message to point you to some information that will help you continue to improve Wikipedia. Sancho McCann 07:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Hi

Sancho McCann - thanks for your note to me. I AM new here, and I do not plan on being a regular contributor. There are a lot more intelligent people here than I could ever hope to be that are doing a marvelous job. I wonder if you might be able to give me more detailed criticism of my work here please. I don't know whether you have left the note because there are some problems with what I've added, or whether your note is a generic one that most 'new' contributors get. Steve Cooke

Hi Steve, No, my note wasn't prompted by anything specific that I thought you needed improvement on. I just thought perhaps your low contribution number might have been from unfamiliarity with everything. But if you'd still like a little more detailed criticism, I'd be glad to take a look at your previous contributions. Sancho McCann 17:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sancho. I do not plan on making regular contributions - just from time to time on subjects I know a little about. The information you sent me is very helpful, and I'll use it in the future. Thank you for your support.

Imaginary Records

Thanks for the improvements you made to Imaginary Records (and related pages). I thought you might be interested in this site - there's an Imaginary Records discography on there, with quite a few scans of record covers. Might be useful in expanding the page further... Cheers! --sparkl_!sm ^talk 19:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Forever or whatever.jpg

{| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" | |This file may be deleted. |} Thanks for uploading Image:Forever or whatever.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Intercooler.jpg

{| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" | |This file may be deleted. |} Thanks for uploading Image:Intercooler.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-WGSG-V.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stairs-WGSG-V.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-RITBOYM.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stairs-RITBOYM.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-MRB-UK.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stairs-MRB-UK.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-MJ-V.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stairs-MJ-V.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-LTA-CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stairs-LTA-CD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check to see whether the fair use rationale I added is adequate. Sa cooke 21:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epicure

The chronology that you provide should relate to that specific type i.e albums should only list previous & next albums (it should include singles or other releases) - similarly the chronology for singles should only list the previous and next singles (not list albums or other releases) Dan arndt 09:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, not entirely sure what you mean by "albums should only list previous & next albums (it should include singles or other releases)". However, I get the drift from the rest of your comment. Fair enough. I believe Wikipedia is a free-to-edit, collaborative effort. If I have broken a convention I apologise. You are free to edit at your will. I won't be contributing anymore as others obviously have a much better grasp of the culture and norms.

Just on the matter of "chronology" - a chronology indicates a timeline, a series, or sequence, of events indexed by time. They are typically ordered, usually from earliest to latest. If this is an acceptable definition, then I cannot see why the chronology should not contain ALL releases by an artist, rather than just one type of release. Sa cooke 13:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey don't get discouraged - I am still learning all some of the conventions if you want an idea try looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums which should give you an idea on how to format articles on band's albums. Keep up the contributions - and if you need any help there are plenty of people out there that can help you with formats & layouts - as I found out the hard way myself ... Dan arndt 00:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Struck Thru
[edit]

I have tagged Image:New_Official_Logo_of_Tasmania.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 13:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Fuck off! No 'fair use' was claimed! Read the summary I provided.[reply]

Apologies, this would seem to be Mistag, And please be civil, Above additon struck thru...ShakespeareFan00 14:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Epicure-Elevator.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Epicure-Elevator.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:WRM-Kick.png

Thanks for uploading Image:WRM-Kick.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Intercooler.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Intercooler.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User:East718, you will be blocked from editing. Can you please explain your actions? GlassCobra 07:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I had written to the owner of the so-called 'copyright' material - namely the band the image represented, asking them if they would be willing to relinquish copyright over the image in question, or, failing that, whether they could provide a copyright free photo that would be used on Wikipedia. In the meantime however, some fucker deleted the image from Wikipedia. I see no difference in what that person did and what I did...

What you did counts as vandalism. Revenge is not a good motivator, nor does it help your case. You are welcome to re-upload your picture as long as you have the correct copyright information; however, please do not vandalize again. Thanks. GlassCobra 07:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. The person who deleted the page needs to restore it. I do not have the image - I deleted it from my system knowing it was on Wikipedia. When I get a reply from the copyright holder I'll post it to the image page. Thanks. Oh, and on the matter of vandalism, I view what happened to the image page to also be vandalism - I trust that similar warnings etc have been sent to the person who DELETED the page in question. Thanks.

The user that deleted your image is a trusted administrator, and was in fact doing his duty; your image was licensed incorrectly. It was not intended to be an insult to you, and it was most certainly not vandalism. As I said, revenge is not a good motivator, and you should not disrupt things just to make a point. Furthermore, after discussion with other administrators, your image was deemed unfit for use here as it depicts a currently performing band. More often than not, there are free images that can be used as alternatives; in this case, one has indeed been found, as you know. It has been uploaded and added to the article. I will ask you again to please refrain from vandalizing user pages in the future. Thanks. GlassCobra 07:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should look to who you allow to be 'trusted administrators'. If the sort of decision that your 'trusted administrator' made to simply delete a page without the opportunity for me to reply, were made in the real world (as opposed to this anonymous virtual world, where people hide behind ridiculous pseudonyms) that person would be a lot more accountable for their actions. It looks like I have NO ability to get my case heard unless I do something drastic to get the attention of these so-called 'trusted administrators. Really, your judgment leaves a lot to be desired... And another point - 'Wikipedia is based upon collaborative, good faith editing, and consensus'. Please note the word 'consensus' here. Surely 'consensus' in this context includes talking with the person who created the page content??? So it looks as if it is ok for consensus in some cases but not others. Fuck! I'm surprised Wikipedia gets any contributors at all! Sa cooke (talk) 07:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, the administrator was merely doing his duty and abiding by the rules set out by Wikipedia regarding non-free content. Please see Wikipedia:FU#Policy_2; namely the first criteria. Non-free content is only to be used if no free equivalent can be found; this has been determined to not be the case. As I said previously, the deletion was not any sort of personal attack on you, yet you seem to be determined to make it so. I will again state that disrupting things just to make a point is not acceptable, and would also ask that you refrain from calling into question my judgment and the judgment of the community at large. I am well aware of the importance of consensus, and would ask you to look at the section just above this one, #Replaceable fair use Image:Intercooler.jpg. You were very clearly notified that you had a specific time limit in which to improve the image, and also where to go if you had any questions. If you have further issues regarding administrative action, you are more than welcome to bring it up at the adminstrators' incidents noticeboard; however, do not blank any more pages. Thanks. GlassCobra 08:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

48 hours!? That qualifies as 'consensus'? You have to be kidding... Some of us do real work - we do not have time to be constantly checking back to see what has transpired with pages that were created in good faith. As I said, I had attempted to get copyright approval from the image owner. 48 hours is NOT consensus, or anything like it!Sa cooke (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Real work"? I would ask that you refrain from being condescending; I too have real life commitments, but I consider this quite important. The time limit for non-free images is somewhat short because our copyright policy is very stringent; Wikipedia only uses non-free content when absolutely necessary. Perhaps it was not wise to remove the image from your hard drive once it was uploaded? GlassCobra 08:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And, if you happen to get the copyright approval after 48 hours, the image could have been undeleted by me or East and sort it out. In this case, I found a replacement so no emails are required. I too work on the image copyright issues and this issue comes up fairly often. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found a replacement for the image and it is freely licensed. It is on Wikipedia now, so whatever issues East had with the previous image do not exist for this one. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful!!! Thank you!Sa cooke (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And, while GlassCobra was typing his messages, I already placed the photo in the article. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expando-tuneup24.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Expando-tuneup24.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TheStairsBand.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TheStairsBand.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Stairtex.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stairtex.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Album Network Expando Tuneup 24

I have nominated Album Network Expando Tuneup 24, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Expando-tuneup24.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Expando-tuneup24.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stairs-FM-promo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WGSG-12V.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stairs-WGSG-12V.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WGSG-7V.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stairs-WGSG-7V.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WB-v.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stairs-WB-v.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:IntercoolerGigAdvert.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IntercoolerGigAdvert.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Stairstex lg.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stairstex lg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 13:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Intercooler-GoodnessOfTheGirl.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Intercooler-GoodnessOfTheGirl.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1965 – Through the Looking Glass

The article 1965 – Through the Looking Glass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable comp

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1965TtLG.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1965TtLG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The stairs-flying machine.png)

Thanks for uploading File:The stairs-flying machine.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flying Machine (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Machine (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Machine (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources It seems like you've had a lot of content deleted. Are you familiar with WP:SOURCE, WP:NOTABLE, and particularly WP:OR? Do you have sources to establish notability of this song? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: It's been six years since I last attempted to engage with Wikipedia. It seems not much has changed. A lot of the content I added HAS been deleted, and I would like at least some of it restored. Starting with the stuff you deleted (or proposed for deletion). The recordings I documented are NOTABLE, including this one - it's NOT a song. It is a standalone promotional CD released by the band's US label. The photo I uploaded has also been deleted and requires undeletion (if that is a word). Sa cooke (talk) 00:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sa cooke. You have new messages at Explicit's talk page.
Message added 02:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re Deleted article - Album_Network_Expando_Tuneup_24

Sorry I'm not an admin anymore, I'd suggest you contact an admin or ask maybe at somewhere like WP:AN.

Good luck,

— Cirt (talk) 03:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: Ok, thank you. Can I ask why you are not an admin? After 6 years a lot of my articles have been deleted, and I find it frustrating that I cannot get things back easily. Sa cooke (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was after an ArbCom case, as part of the remedies I was desysopped. I am sorry I cannot help you. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors, — Cirt (talk) 04:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sa cooke/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24

See User:Sa cooke/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24; Once it's sourced well enough to clearly meet WP:N, feel free to move it back to the mainspace. Wily D 08:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sa cooke. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1965 – Through the Looking Glass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1965 – Through the Looking Glass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1965 – Through the Looking Glass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Epicure-ArmiesAgainstMe.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Epicure-ArmiesAgainstMe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Stairtex.jpg

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stairs-WGSG-CD.jpg)

Sea Shepherd

Hi

Imaginary Records

Non-free use disputed for Image:Forever or whatever.jpg

Non-free use disputed for Image:Intercooler.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-WGSG-V.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-RITBOYM.gif

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-MRB-UK.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-MJ-V.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Stairs-LTA-CD.jpg

Epicure

Struck Thru

Fair use disputed for Image:Epicure-Elevator.png

Fair use disputed for Image:WRM-Kick.png

Replaceable fair use Image:Intercooler.jpg

February 2008

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expando-tuneup24.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:TheStairsBand.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:Stairtex.jpg

Articles for deletion nomination of Album Network Expando Tuneup 24

Orphaned non-free image File:Expando-tuneup24.jpg

File permission problem with File:Stairs-FM-promo.jpg

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WGSG-12V.jpg

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WGSG-7V.jpg

File permission problem with File:Stairs-WB-v.jpg

Possibly unfree File:IntercoolerGigAdvert.JPG

Possibly unfree File:Stairstex lg.png

Orphaned non-free media (File:Intercooler-GoodnessOfTheGirl.png)

Proposed deletion of 1965 – Through the Looking Glass

Orphaned non-free image File:1965TtLG.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (File:The stairs-flying machine.png)

Nomination of Flying Machine (song) for deletion

Talkback

re Deleted article - Album_Network_Expando_Tuneup_24

User:Sa cooke/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24

Talkback

Nomination of 1965 – Through the Looking Glass for deletion

ArbCom elections are now open!

Orphaned non-free image File:Epicure-ArmiesAgainstMe.png

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:New Official Logo of Tasmania.jpg