Jump to content

User talk:SYITS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to wikipedia

[edit]

Cornuke is a highly controversial figure, please discuss it on the talk page before making major edits. Thanks. JoshuaZ 21:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Please do not remove facts about LBU not having accreditation or any other cited claims. Please do not add "original work" which is uncited claims about Wyatt or Cornuke's videos. To add this information please provide reialable sources. Arbusto 22:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I like your contribs on Bob Cornuke. Good job! And truly, welcome to Wikipedia! Don't worry about Josh and Arbo. They like to pester Christians and alter Christian articles. If I were you, I wouldn't listen to a word either of them say. --Doe, John 23:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)This user now indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet[reply]

Pattern

[edit]
Funny how SYITS's account becomes active in the midst of other suspected Gastrich white washing at the LBU page. Arbusto 01:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Log:[reply]

SYITS IS NOT GASTRICH

[edit]

Just to set the record straight, I am not this Gastrich guy! With all these accusations flying around, I'd almost like to meet him just to find out what he did to cause such a stir!! Any way, it doesn't matter what various users think, Wikipedia has my IP and registration details.

--SYITS 00:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The man created about 60 or so sockpuppets, constructed an organization from outside Wikipedia to gather people to support his views, engaged in massive violations of WP:AUTO,WP:NPOV,WP:NPA,WP:CIVIL and just about every other Wikipedia rule and guideline, if you want more information you should go to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jason Gastrich. JoshuaZ 01:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link, quite a legacy, indeed... In light of this case and it's recency, I can see why everyone's so quick on the trigger! There will be none of that from me...
--SYITS 02:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't want to get thrown in the bin with Gastrich don't make edits with deceiving summaries that whitewash criticism on subjects related to Gastrich[2]. Arbusto 05:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


None of my entries are deceiving or whitewashing, you simply happen to disagree with them. So, instead of debunking my material, you choose to attack my credibility. Pretty standard tactic really, but one that comes of desperation...
I also believe I am free to edit and contribute where I please on this website, provided I follow the guidelines, which I have, so please don't tell me what I can or can't edit or what I can or can't think. Leave that to the government ;)


--SYITS 00:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. Arbustoo has also been blocked and the page reverted to its state before the edit war broke out. This is not an endorsement of the current version. --Sam Blanning(talk) 01:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 24 hours for 3rr in the same article. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 01:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Education

[edit]

Could you please direct us to a citation of Cornuke's undergraduate-Bachelor's degree? Arbusto 19:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

[edit]

Now that we've established who you aren't, you should feel completely free to tell us all a little about who you are! Anonymous as you want...I just don't think you want people to think of you as the "EDITOR WHO ISN'T GASTRICH" astiqueparervoir 01:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dont do that

[edit]

You just dropped in a copy of the repeatedly removed copy right violation highly POV "official biography" on the Cornuke page. Please don't do that. JoshuaZ 05:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to make changes that include WP:OR and violate WP:NPOV. Employment as a police officer does not equate into a historical expert. It is POV to claim otherwise. Arbustoo 04:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Patrick, you appear to be here for the sole purpose of whitewashing the Bob Cornuke article. I know you were impressed by him when you took the tour with him, but here we have to work with what the reliable secondary sources say. Guy (Help!) 10:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]