User talk:SWINGTALL

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Metrobus (bus company) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to 1925 in Afghanistan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Goodwin Sports Centre. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Marlith (Talk)  17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Account blocked: vandalism only account

The account is blocked for 24 hours because all March 2008 edits are vandalism/testing. Please take your time to read wikipedia:Welcome page and consider doing something useful instead. `'Míkka>t 19:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Fresh Maggots

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fresh Maggots, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fresh Maggots seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fresh Maggots, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

FAC withdrawn

I appreciate you're acting in good faith but it's best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. This way they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar with the sources to make any suggested improvements. Someone who hasn't worked on the article can't provide this input, so the FAC rumbles on until the opposes become so overwhelming that the article is failed, taking a lot of reviewers' time. While the Home computer article is reasonable, it is not FAC quality as is evidenced by the lukewarm reception, so I have archived it. I suggest you first work an article up through peer review to prepare for WP:FAC. Maralia (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)