Hello, STRONGlk7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Charcoal. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The ROKMC had fire exercise before the bombardment of Yeonpyeong, and used every shell during the exercise. Marines had to reload shells by hand from armory under heavy fire, which dramatically reduces the rate of fire. The source you used describes the rate of fire under specific condition not during an ideal situation. For comparison, if a fighter jet uses afterburner all the time in specific condition, should we record the range of the jet much shorter than known ideal specification? In addition, a soldier fires a M-16 rifle once every 5 seconds due to heavy fire, should the rate of fire of the M-16 be 12 rounds per minute? Kadrun (talk) 23:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please undo your recent edit to the article "crab". Your edit summary of "meaningless editing" is unclear, and cannot be true. Ther previous image was a far better illustration of a crab dish than the replacement you inserted, and that must be the overriding consideration when choosing images to appear in an encyclopaedia. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You said "Better to show a dish only containing crab". So I uploaded crab dishes.
Japanese people are eating a crab most in the world. Moreover, those dishes are rich in originality and variety (For example, here). They are important as culture of the crab dish. It is appropriate to show them as an image of the "crab dish". The photograph which you have presented is a very minor dish. STRONGlk7 (talk) 09:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the previous image, the crab dish was large enough to be recognisable. Your image shows some crockery in the distance, and provides very little information about their contents. Better a visible, but (allegedly) minor dish than an invisible one. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I said you "Do not write here. Write to the Talk of crab.", OK?
The full resolution of this image is 4,000 × 3,000 pixels. It is sufficient resolution.
And I showed that various kinds of crab dishes existed. The "premise" which you presented is a false charge.
Why are you violating WP:SEEALSO by adding links to the IJN and aircraft carrier when they're already linked in the main body of the article? And what is the connection between the anime and Hosho? The article on the anime doesn't mention the carrier.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Odakyu 50000 series VSE shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
