User talk:STEGASAURUS REX
June 2010
[edit]
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Gary Brooks Faulkner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Gary Brooks Faulkner
[edit]If you feel strongly about keeping this article i can help you. Unfortunately my interest in Faulkner has faded a bit. I feel that the debate for this article was acutally improperly closed. I am fairly certain you can get the article restored simply by taking it to Deletion Review which can be found here: Wikipedia:Deletion review. You would have to argue that final outcome of the debate was in favor of keep or no concensus (which in fact it was). Keep in mind wikpedia is not a vote. The debate's outcome is based on the validity of your argument. You can bring up people like Seung-Hui Cho and Nadya Suleman who are also notable for only one event (both of those article have gone through AfDs and passed).
After you create the DRV you can restore the article legally and put the tag:
{{tempundelete}}
If you need help just ask me. Valoem talk 19:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)