User talk:STARSsocialclub
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, STARSsocialclub, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page SAFETRIP (company), have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 01:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HappyGoLucky18, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 01:56, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
STARSsocialclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My page was blocked without a certifiable explanation. I've been a contributor for the past 3 years and have never been treated so unfairly. This is why honest contributors hate this platform.
Decline reason:
The explanation is in the two sections immediately above this, "Sockpuppet investigation" and "September 2018", and you will need to address that if you wish to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Drmies Boing! said Zebedee This is my only account. The last article that I edited was for a new wiki contributor. I was correcting the article minutes before it was deleted. Myself and another admin. I'm very familiar with the software company SAFETRIP. The editing wasn't done in an abusive manner. In this case, the sock puppet violation is a big misunderstanding. My apologies. I didnt intend for the other user to be attacked by multiple contributors on their talk page.
STARSsocialclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This violation was a misunderstanding and it was my first violation. I've had this account for 3 years and it was my first major attempt at editing a published article. Please be lenient. This is a learning process for all of us and no rules are etched in stone. Thank you. STARSsocialclub (talk) 21:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Blocked for socking and per checkuser evidence. Will also need a rename if unblocked. Will, IMO, need to eschew writing about SAFETRIP. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- What is the relationship between you and User:HappyGoLucky18? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 21:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
---jpgordon We don't have a relationship. I am, however, attempting to build relationships with contributors to make this a more pleasant editing experience.
--jpgordon Did you notice user ---Dlohcierekim just re-blocked me for responding to you vs. him/her? That's the admin behavior that makes Wikipedia a hostile environment. A total abuse of power.
- "We don't have a relationship." Then please explain to us why, at 0019 Sep 13, HappyGoLucky18 re-creates the deleted article SAFETRIP (company); then, on the same IP, on the same computer, this account recovers its password (the account having been dormant since it was created in 2015) and then makes its first edit ever on that same article? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 23:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
User:Jpgordon Again, I do not have a relationship with that user. We certainly were not on the same computer. Possibly the same IP network. You all came to a conclusion that I have two pages, which is false. I am aware that having multiple pages isn't against the rules, but I do not have multiple pages. I work in a tech space with multiple wiki contributors and even wiki admins who teach how to edit/create pages. They could've came to my aid on this issue, but I'm an honest person. I was simply editing an article which has turned out to be a big mistake.
STARSsocialclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My first offense of sock puppeting was an honest mistake. I ONLY have 1 account despite similar IP address to the other account. I have no relationship to the other user and I was only attempting to edit an article, nothing abusive or destructive. PLEASE do not allow admins Dlohcierekim to abuse his/her power by ignoring my sincere request. Thank you. STARSsocialclub (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not believable. You were editing the same article from the same IP address. You use the same idiosyncratic language. If you can come up with a better explanation than "I didn't do it!" you can appeal via WP:UTRS. Like the other account's denials, this is going nowhere. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:25, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Actually, you were not unblocked so I could not reblock you. I did however decline to unblock you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.