User talk:SRandaall

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Faisalabad has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Faisalabad was changed by SRandaall (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865506 on 2016-01-08T22:22:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Faisalabad

Just wanted to stop by and say thank you for your contributions at Faisalabad. Your style of writing, the content you added, and sources you cited are indeed an improvement, and exactly what that article needed. I look forward to seeing more of your work on Wikipedia, and will welcome the opportunity to work collaboratively with you in the future. Atsme^📞📧 04:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lahore

I have so enjoyed collaborating with you on Faisalabad, SRandaall. Would you consider copyediting Lahore in much the same way? It's on my watchlist, but now that you have helped so much with Faisalabad, we could probably squeeze in a little copyedit time on Lahore. I suggest we start by addressing the issues brought to light in the templates at the top of the page, and also any inline templates that may be scattered throughout the article. Atsme^📞📧 00:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Atsme Sure. Thank you for your help and assistance with Faisalabad. Looks much healthier now.--SRandaall (talk) 21:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. 😊 I will go through it all again for copyediting purposes - the ref list needs quite a bit of work to achieve consistency and reduce redundancy of refs by using page numbers instead of individual citations for the same refs. When that's done, we can see if the vandalism slows and what direction to take for nominating it as a FA. Next on the menu - Lahore. Atsme^📞📧 21:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! There isnt much left to add to be honest. I am trying to source some pictures. The current ones are quite outdated. --SRandaall (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA/N

You should nominate Faisalabad for WP:GA promotion. I think we've bagged it. Atsme^📞📧 20:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) I have added the link to the top of the talk page. I am a little confused by what I have to do. Can you take a look.--SRandaall (talk) 12:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SRandall, I looked at the article again to see how things are progressing, and saw that the citations need to be fixed. I'm currently working on a FAC and a GAN, so I don't have time to get into the references at Faisalabad. If you could go down the list one by one, and make sure there is (1) consistency, (2) all are live links, (3) and make sure each citation has the correct form it would be a big help. If not, it will hold up the GAR because that's one of the first things the reviewer will insist upon before promoting the article. Thanks!! Atsme^📞📧 13:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Faisalabad

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Faisalabad you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Faisalabad

The article Faisalabad you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Faisalabad for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SRandaall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Faisalabad City District Government Emblem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faisalabad City District Government Emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]