Jump to content

User talk:SPBLU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SPBLU, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 20:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question for American Superstar

[edit]

I'm sorry to bother you but is it confirmed that the track is the third single for Flo Rida's album? Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 20:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found it on this website but I can't remember what site

Where? --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 23:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of American Superstar

[edit]

An editor has nominated American Superstar, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Superstar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 05:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with American Superstar. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Fabrictramp (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for editing the page You Hear Me? on Wikipedia. Please be careful not to remove maintenance templates from articles without addressing the issue listed. If you believe the tag is placed in error use the article's associated talk page to explain your changes. Thank you.--Fabrictramp (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm serious -- don't remove maintenance templates from articles without addressing the issue listed.--Fabrictramp (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Erechtheus (talk) 18:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, odd I should bump into you twice. I have cleaned up the article a little, but could you please provide some reliable sources demonstrating the notability of the subject? J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to You Hear Me?, you will be blocked from editing. Again, stop removing maintenance templates. This is your last warning. Fabrictramp (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry i didn't thing it was supposed to be there again I sorry.

Well ya won't have to worry bout that I ain't maknig anymore articles cause i SUK User: SPBLU

Talk pages...

[edit]

...are meant to be used to discuss actions on Wikipedia. If you want to talk about DVDs, please see my YouTube account. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what ev. User: SPBLU

Fair use images in the userspace

[edit]

Please do NOT place fair use images in the userspace, and reverting my edits without comment is not going to do you any good at all. J Milburn (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles For Deletion

[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Donk (song). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Donk (song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want to havethe article deleted, put your thoughts here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donk (song). Removing the tag won't help preventing the article from being deleted. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the point they never freakin listen to me User:SPBLU

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Donk (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Donk (song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Donk (song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick thing

[edit]

You can't so-call "delete" an article by blanking it. Redirecting it was a better choice. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Finger

[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Skinny Bitch in the Kitch: Kick-Ass Recipes for Hungry Girls Who Want to Stop Cooking Crap (and Start Looking Hot!). Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Carlosguitar (Yes Executor?) 01:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Esanchez7587/Userboxes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oh, looks like someone's in trouble :D Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 23:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to User:Esanchez7587/Userboxes.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bad boy :D Last chance or I'll block you... Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lil' Wil

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lil' Wil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —BradV 01:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lil' Wil

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lil' Wil, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil' Wil. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Joccin On Yo Bitch Ass. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 20:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Esanchez7587, you will be blocked from editing. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you have no power to block me. I can block you though and I already have. One more mistake and I'll block you again. Have a nice day :) --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=D

[edit]

How are you "better than me"? I see everyone equal and I also delete more than just your articles because of various reasons. Articles that are nonsense, articles that don't show have any notability, articles up for speedy deletion... I'm following the policy here. Why I block you? For vandalism and creation of articles that don't show notability. I could have blocked you again but I give you chances to fix yourself. If the articles you create show anything worthy to have up, then let it be. But if it doesn't show nothing of that (notability), then it should be disposed. Now, I'm just warning right now. The "Fairly Odd Parents" article looks a bit suspicious. Where are the sources of this? Put it and I could judge it. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 23:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How To Delete An Article

[edit]
By default, only administrators can delete the articles. Since I am one, I have the option to delete an article but as long I have a reason. Any other user, however, has other methods to propose deletion on an article, image, or template. They just can't delete it themselves though. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Now That's What I Call Music! 69 (U.K. series) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Lil' Wil, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to NBB. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with IDance. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

My Name is....

[edit]

Yeah, like I would tell you. Seriously, I don't give out my name. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How? I just don't give out my name. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with IDance, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons

[edit]

Since when did you contribute to the Simpsons articles? --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About 2 weeks ago why? SPBLU User talk:SPBLU

Because you gave yourself an award to editing the Simpsons, when you have no edits done in the articles. I just realized that. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did, leave me alone SPBLU User talk:SPBLU

Please stop now

[edit]

Please stop impersonating a Wikipedia administrator as you did here. I can see that this talkpage is a laundry-list of recent warnings; if I see any further disruption from you you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – iridescent 18:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lost In Love (song)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lost In Love (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? InDeBiz1 (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE

[edit]

I don't think there is. --19:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

How To Protect A Page

[edit]

As just a user, you can request it here but only for more important reasons such as edit-warring or vandalism. I don't think you would be given the protection though, since there is no point to it. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-Tunes

[edit]

Per this, I-Tunes saying something is an official single does not make it factual. A record can be released for download on I-Tunes and still not be an official single for radio airplay (and with it, Wikipedia purposes). Reliable sources for singles include: FMQB, All Access, Radio and Records, or the artist's official website with a cited news piece released by the record label. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 18:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

[edit]

Please don't block out buttons on your userpage with images, it make navigation much more cumbersome. Thanks, Prodego talk 03:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You readded the images, and I have removed them again. Please do not do this, because it blocks the page navigation buttons. If you continue, you may be either blocked or your userpage may be temporarily locked. Prodego talk 16:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-created your previously deleted article, making sure to establish notability this time around. Feel free to expand it, as long as you properly source anything that you add. Happy editing! --InDeBiz1 (talk) 06:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:SPBLU

[edit]

Template:SPBLU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Mww113 (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the tfd notice from the template until the discussion is over. --Geniac (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't change the AfD comments of others

[edit]

Do not remove the comments of others at AfDs, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Hear Me?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Camp Rock 2, you will be blocked from editing. Removal of the AfD on the article Camp Rock 2 (you just don't get it when it comes to AfD's) Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Rock 2, you will be blocked from editing. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 22:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to edit disruptively after many "final" warnings. Given the laundry-list of block notices on this page, please take this time off to read Wikipedia policy if you plan to continue when the block expires/is lifted. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  – iridescent 22:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Due to this edit I have extended your block to indefinite. Prodego talk 18:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]